Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#discussion_r222144135
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastHashJoin.scala
---
@@ -117,6 +120,87 @@ case class BroadcastHashJoin(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96872/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
**[Test build #96872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96872/testReport)**
for PR 22047 at commit
Github user kmanamcheri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222140323
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
**[Test build #96870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96870/testReport)**
for PR 22347 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22491
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22491
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22500#discussion_r222138844
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/MiscBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -21,247 +21,125 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96869/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22527
**[Test build #96869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96869/testReport)**
for PR 22527 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22491
**[Test build #96878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96878/testReport)**
for PR 22491 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22488
**[Test build #96879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96879/testReport)**
for PR 22488 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22488
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22500
**[Test build #96877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96877/testReport)**
for PR 22500 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22500
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22500
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96866/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222135430
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22605
**[Test build #96866 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96866/testReport)**
for PR 22605 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222134301
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222134090
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
**[Test build #96876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96876/testReport)**
for PR 22616 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96865/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616#discussion_r222126406
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -285,8 +285,6 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22503
**[Test build #96865 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96865/testReport)**
for PR 22503 at commit
Github user ankuriitg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616#discussion_r222125433
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -285,8 +285,6 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22492
Thank you! Although `master` becomes
[3.0.0](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22606) already and seems to start
to target `Mar 2019`, I agree with you on reverting for rechecking, @mengxr
Github user ankuriitg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22604
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222123856
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user kmanamcheri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222123426
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96861/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22605
**[Test build #96861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96861/testReport)**
for PR 22605 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616#discussion_r222122081
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -318,19 +316,20 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616#discussion_r222122237
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -285,8 +285,6 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222122774
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614#discussion_r222122400
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -746,34 +746,20 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
**[Test build #96875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96875/testReport)**
for PR 22616 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614
Looks ok to me based on discussion in the bug. Will leave here to see if
others have any comments.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22492
@cloud-fan said above the next version is very likely to be 2.5.0 instead
of 3.0. Well the next version number is not fully discussed yet. For that
reason, I think we should revert the changes in
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22492
May I ask a question, @mengxr ? The master becomes 3.0 today by @gatorsmile
's PR and I saw the following your comment here.
> We can keep it in master if the next release is 3.0.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96868/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22614
**[Test build #96868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96868/testReport)**
for PR 22614 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22618
**[Test build #96874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96874/testReport)**
for PR 22618 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22618
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22618
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22492
@WeichenXu123 @cloud-fan I made https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22618
to revert the change in master.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22618
[SPARK-25321][ML] Revert SPARK-14681 to avoid API breaking change
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is the same as #22492 but for master branch. Revert SPARK-14681 to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22617
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22617
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22617
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user peter-toth opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22617
[SPARK-25484][TEST] Refactor ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Refactor ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark
2.
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22557
lgtm
will leave for a day before mergning
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21632
@holdenk @jkbradley ping... could you please take a look at this PR? Thank
you!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22604
OK, this PR should be closed then.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22615#discussion_r222097177
--- Diff: docs/building-spark.md ---
@@ -49,25 +49,20 @@ To create a Spark distribution like those distributed
by the
to be runnable, use
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
**[Test build #96873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96873/testReport)**
for PR 22237 at commit
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
@HyukjinKwon Please, take a look at the PR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22609
I will close the PR and document in our tests to use spark.ui.retainedTasks
= 1 (or some very low value) : which will, in effect, be equivalent to this PR
- and loose information anyway; but will
Github user mridulm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22609
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22429
Is there anything which blocks the PR for now?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22379
Could you take a look at the PR one more time, please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22609
> I tried that a lot while writing this code, but the disk store is just
too slow
That is unfortunate ... I was actually hoping that would be a good
compromise if expanded api
Github user Dooyoung-Hwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
Thank you for review.
Yes, ThriftServer will use intermediate "collection view" in this PR.
And [Original PR of
ThriftServer](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22219) will be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
**[Test build #96872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96872/testReport)**
for PR 22047 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598
**[Test build #96871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96871/testReport)**
for PR 22598 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r222082996
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/KafkaDelegationTokenProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r222083143
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -560,25 +553,56 @@ private[kafka010]
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r222083063
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopDelegationTokenManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ class
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r222082853
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSecurityHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
**[Test build #96870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96870/testReport)**
for PR 22347 at commit
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22527
I restructured the code in this commit to allow easier addition of
array/list support in the future.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22609
Task events still might need to be processed - even for live applications
with the UI disabled. See the API that has been mentioned before
(`SparkStatusTracker`) for why. Processing task events is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
Thank you for your first contribution, @Dooyoung-Hwang ! So, this is a
spin-off PR from STS?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22527#discussion_r222079624
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -1100,13 +1101,23 @@ object SQLContext {
attrs:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22347
Retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22527
**[Test build #96869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96869/testReport)**
for PR 22527 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22609
@vanzin any reason why liveStore is hardcoded to be in-memory ? Any
implications of making it disk backed ? That might be another option to unblock
- requires a config change to existing
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22524
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96860/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22524
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22609
@vanzin , @gengliangwang To clarify earlier behavior - if UI is disabled,
any task related metrics were reported as zero: granularity of update was at
the stage level.
UI is typically disabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22524
**[Test build #96860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96860/testReport)**
for PR 22524 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22602#discussion_r222071791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user ankuriitg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
@srowen @yanboliang
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ankuriitg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22604
I have opened another PR for this, with the recommended changes:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
I had to change a few other logDebug statements as well. Please let me know
if
GitHub user ankuriitg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22616
[SPARK-25586][Core] Remove logdebug statement for outer objects from
ClosureCleaner
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cause: Recently test_glr_summary failed
101 - 200 of 475 matches
Mail list logo