Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
**[Test build #98340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98340/testReport)**
for PR 22912 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22917
**[Test build #98339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98339/testReport)**
for PR 22917 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22429
**[Test build #98324 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98324/testReport)**
for PR 22429 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
I messed up branches & naming enough I thought it would be simpler to just
open a new PR here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22917
---
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22917
[SPARK-25827][CORE] Encrypted blocks can be over 2GB.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid converting encrypted bocks to regular ByteBuffers.
Also updates some
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4683/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
**[Test build #98338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98338/testReport)**
for PR 22916 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98338/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
**[Test build #98338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98338/testReport)**
for PR 22916 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98337/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
**[Test build #98337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98337/testReport)**
for PR 22915 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4683/
---
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22916
[SPARK-25855][CORE] Encrypted blocks can be over 2GB.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid converting encrypted bocks to regular ByteBuffers.
Also updates some
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98325/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
**[Test build #98325 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98325/testReport)**
for PR 22288 at commit
Github user shahidki31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
Yes. Thank you @srowen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user patrickbrownsync commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22883
I would be happy to start thinking about that.
Can you provide more details on what you mean by data loss on write in the
InMemoryStore?
I now see that the types being
Github user ifilonenko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Just a note, this PR has some overlaps with
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915. But just after a brief skim, I am a
bit hesitant on storing keytabs in secrets, but it might have to be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
**[Test build #98337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98337/testReport)**
for PR 22915 at commit
GitHub user ifilonenko opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22915
[SPARK-25825][K8S][WIP] Enable token renewal for both --keytab and
tokenSecret
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enabled token renewal when specifying `--keytab` or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
**[Test build #4400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4400/testReport)**
for PR 22914 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22818
I also changed the issue to SPARK-25904 -- there are some other things
related to encryption that it makes more sense to handle under SPARK-25827.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22626
**[Test build #98336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98336/testReport)**
for PR 22626 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4682/
---
Github user shahidki31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
The code here (and all the other pages) intended to check out of bound
exception and fall back to the first page.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4682/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22847
Can / should we apply the same threshold conf to
`Expression.reduceCodeSize()`?
cc @yucai @cloud-fan @kiszk
---
-
To
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22847
Using source code length will have to be a very coarse-grained, "fuzzy"
heuristic. It's not meant to be accurate. So just pick some number that makes
sense.
2048 might be a good enough
Github user shahidki31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
cc @srowen . Kindly review
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
GitHub user shahidki31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22914
[SPARK-25900][WEBUI]If the When the page number is more than the total page
size, then fall back to the first page
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we enter the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
**[Test build #98335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98335/testReport)**
for PR 19045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98335/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
**[Test build #98335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98335/testReport)**
for PR 19045 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
@ifilonenko @skonto
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22878
**[Test build #98323 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98323/testReport)**
for PR 22878 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22818
@kiszk I've updated this to cover more cases. I didn't cover some of them
in mllib-local, as ByteArrayMethods isn't visible there, and it would really
only very slightly improve an error msg, so
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22878
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98323/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22878
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22907
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22907
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98321/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22907
**[Test build #98321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98321/testReport)**
for PR 22907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4680/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22913
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
You mentioned in the description that you did some manual testing -- since
this has been through some changes since the initial versions, can you do that
again? please be sure to run some manual
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22913
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22913
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user javierluraschi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22913
[SPARK-25902][SQL] Add support for dates with milliseconds in Apache Arrow
bindings
Currently, the Apache Arrow bindings for Java only support `Date` with the
metric set to `DateUnit.DAY`,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4680/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98334/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
**[Test build #98334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98334/testReport)**
for PR 22912 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
**[Test build #98334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98334/testReport)**
for PR 22912 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98333/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
**[Test build #98333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98333/testReport)**
for PR 22911 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98320/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user yogeshg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22912
[SPARK-25901] Use only one thread in BarrierTaskContext companion object
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now we use only one `timer` (and thus a backing thread) in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4679/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22899
**[Test build #98320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98320/testReport)**
for PR 22899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
**[Test build #98332 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98332/testReport)**
for PR 22760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98332/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22892
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22892
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98319/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22892
**[Test build #98319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98319/testReport)**
for PR 22892 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
**[Test build #98333 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98333/testReport)**
for PR 22911 at commit
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22911
[SPARK-25815][k8s] Support kerberos in client mode, keytab-based token
renewal.
This change hooks up the k8s backed to the updated
HadoopDelegationTokenManager,
so that delegation tokens are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4679/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22908
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98322/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22760
**[Test build #98332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98332/testReport)**
for PR 22760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22908
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22908
**[Test build #98322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98322/testReport)**
for PR 22908 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22857
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98318/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
**[Test build #98318 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98318/testReport)**
for PR 22029 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22857
Thanks all for reviewing! The latest change looks good to me too. Merged
into master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
101 - 200 of 584 matches
Mail list logo
