Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22087
PredictionModel as a super-class of unsupervised and supervised seems sane
to me. Returning a double to unify the signature also seems sane, although the
thought of casting it might irk
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22087
This LGTM, but it raises a more general question about the lack of
single-sample prediction over the entire hierarchy. For example (IMO) there
should be some kind of single-sample method
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
@mccheah integration testing is passing with the latest container selection
policy, good to merge?
---
-
To unsubscribe
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
thanks @shaneknapp !
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
k8s integration test failure appears repeatable:
```
Downloading from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/squareup/okhttp3/okhttp/3.9.1/okhttp-3.9.1.jar
[WARNING
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
Latest container selection w/ default to first LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
merging
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820#discussion_r228321586
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/KubernetesUtils.scala
---
@@ -157,7 +157,10 @@ private[spark
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820#discussion_r228321407
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ logs and remains in "completed" state in the Kubernetes
API until it's
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838
LGTM - the k8s integration tests are off by default, can be run via
`-P...`, and are passwing via Jenkins
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22433
@suryag10, all things being equal, it is considered preferable to provide
testing for new functionality on the same PR. Are there are logistical problems
adding testing here
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22433
@suryag10 you were probably encountering github server problems from
yesterday:
https://status.github.com/messages
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
update - I'm consulting with some teammates about what it might mean to
also support Bayesian variations on split quality, since there has been a lot
of interest in the last few years
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225625939
--- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh ---
@@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build {
--build-arg
base_img=$(image_ref spark
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608
Although this is a large patch, its impact on existing code is small, and
it is nearly all testing code. Unless the tests themselves are unstable, I'd
consider this plausible to include
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608
re: hadoop-2.7.3.tgz is that something Shane needs to install on the
testing infra, to build the images you want
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608
@ifilonenko can we work with the existing service-account-name config
parameters for obtaining the resource permissions
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22433
If possible, there should be some basic integration testing. Run a thrift
server command against the minishift cluster used by the other testing
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22433
In the scenario of a cluster-mode submission, what is the command-line
behavior? Does the thrift-server script "block" until the thrift server pod is
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
I think targeting 3.0 with a refactor makes the most sense. There's no way
to do this without making small breaking changes, but slightly larger changes
could clean up the design
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440#discussion_r218997600
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Gini.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +71,23 @@ object Gini extends Impurity {
@Since
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440#discussion_r218252461
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Impurity.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,49 @@ trait Impurity extends Serializable
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440#discussion_r218252156
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Gini.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +71,23 @@ object Gini extends Impurity {
@Since
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440#discussion_r218246415
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Gini.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +71,23 @@ object Gini extends Impurity {
@Since
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440#discussion_r218245862
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/ChiSquared.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440#discussion_r218245670
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -670,14 +670,32 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22433
I'm wondering, is there some reason this isn't supported in cluster mode
for yarn & mesos? Or put another way, what is the rationale for k8s being added
as an exception to this
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22381
These new metrics seem useful. Is there a way to provide unit or
integration testing for it?
Do these have enable/disable via metrics.properties files
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
+1 for @skonto recommendation about CI testing templates populated with
larger numbers of fields, and template errors
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22294
cc @srowen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
GitHub user erikerlandson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22294
[SPARK-25287][INFRA] Add up-front check for JIRA_USERNAME and JIRA_PASSWORD
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add an up-front check that `JIRA_USERNAME
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22179
For maximum breaking-change forgiveness, the "safe" option would be to punt
it to 3.0; which seems likely to be the next rel
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22179
If it doesn't expose any breaking changes to users, that seems reasonable.
I assume there would be no integration problems with scala 2.12
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22285
looks like alpine doesn't have PAM installed
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22285
jenkins test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e
GitHub user erikerlandson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22285
[SPARK-25275][K8S] require memberhip in wheel to run 'su' in dockerfiles
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a PAM configuration in k8s dockerfile to require
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21279#discussion_r213317184
--- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh ---
@@ -44,15 +44,37 @@ function image_ref {
function build {
local BUILD_ARGS
local IMG_PATH
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21279#discussion_r213316408
--- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh ---
@@ -44,15 +44,37 @@ function image_ref {
function build {
local BUILD_ARGS
local IMG_PATH
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21279#discussion_r213314870
--- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh ---
@@ -44,15 +44,37 @@ function image_ref {
function build {
local BUILD_ARGS
local IMG_PATH
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22212
I agree there's an argument for keeping this, but an alternative would be
to leave the original for backward compatability, deprecate it, and recommend
people make use of custom pod templates
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22212#discussion_r213127037
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -663,11 +663,21 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212668742
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ private[spark] object
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212469389
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ private[spark] object
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212460665
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -775,4 +787,183 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
This sets the major Python version
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212438850
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ private[spark] object
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212423082
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -775,4 +787,183 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
This sets the major Python version
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212424515
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -775,4 +787,183 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
This sets the major Python version
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212423941
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -775,4 +787,183 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
This sets the major Python version
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212399808
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ private[spark] object
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146#discussion_r212364915
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ private[spark] object
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
Thanks @onursatici!
Can you please resolve merge conflicts (rebase?), so CI can build it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22146
Jenkins, OK to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21555
LGMT, I am OK to merge.
Most of the automated image build tooling I've seen is custom, but I agree
w/ Matt that being able to selectively build is worth supporting, via a
followup PR
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
testing environment is synced again and its passing, so I'm going to merge
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21551
@fabriziocucci can you close this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
Jenkins, test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21551
OK, I see it referenced above as commit b8dbfcc. I'd close this, but that
option is disabled for me. Probably assuming it happens from the merge-pr
script
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21551
@mccheah this isn't showing as merged, you said you ran the merge script?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
please test this
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572#discussion_r195866275
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -37,11 +37,17 @@ if [ -z "$uidentry" ] ; th
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572#discussion_r195811228
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ fi
SPARK_K8S_CMD=&qu
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572#discussion_r195804610
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ fi
SPARK_K8S_CMD=&qu
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572#discussion_r195794051
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ fi
SPARK_K8S_CMD=&qu
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572#discussion_r195793358
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -110,8 +110,7 @@ case "$SPARK_K8
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572#discussion_r195787809
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ fi
SPARK_K8S_CMD=&qu
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
@rimolive there are some significant differences between the head of master
and your file. I'm wondering if you should get the head of master and re-edit
from there, because rebasing didn't
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
@rimolive I think you may need to rebase this to latest head of master, to
pick up the pyspark updates
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21572
Thanks @rimolive ! Can you please prepend `[SPARK-24534][K8S]` to the
title of this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21366#discussion_r190755750
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/DeterministicExecutorPodsEventQueue.scala
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21366#discussion_r189735073
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@
4.5.4
4.4.8
+3.0.1
--- End diff --
My take
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21366#discussion_r189435162
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@
4.5.4
4.4.8
+3.0.1
--- End diff --
it looks like this dep
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21238
I agree with @mcheah that the potential code reuse is small. Keeping this
as a separate pod construction step, decoupled from the user-exposed step, is
cleaner
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21241#discussion_r186859389
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21241#discussion_r186855467
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -561,6 +561,13 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
This is distinct from spark.executor.cores
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21241#discussion_r186846341
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -561,6 +561,13 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
This is distinct from spark.executor.cores
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21241#discussion_r186839692
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
@ssuchter good point, they should. I thought they were set up to be invoked
because kube has already been added to modules.py
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Barring further feedback, resolving a two issues should have this ready to
merge:
1. move cloud-backed testing to a new PR
1. remove the repository clone logic
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21092
@holdenk I think your [comment
above](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21092#issuecomment-383211329) gets
at a use-case "ambiguity" that containerization causes. There are no
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21092#discussion_r183161979
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+#
+# Licensed
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21092#discussion_r182564020
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/features/BasicDriverFeatureStep.scala
---
@@ -71,7 +77,7
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21092#discussion_r182563748
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -62,6 +69,14 @@ case "$SPARK_K8
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21092
Thanks @ifilonenko !
I'm interested in figuring out what it means for the container images to be
"python 2/3 generic" - does that imply being able to run either, based
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20669
@mccheah workflow is to use `dev/merge_spark_pr.py`
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20669#discussion_r175532438
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -53,14 +53,10 @@ fi
case "$SPARK_K8
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
LGTM, pending tests
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822#discussion_r174527459
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
#
# echo commands
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
jenkins please test this
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
@rimolive thanks for this!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19775
Although this is not kube-specific, kubernetes deployment is a major
prometheus use case. Has it been tested in a kube environment
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19775
I agree w/ @jerryshao that adding new deps to core isn't ideal. (Also that
having #11994 would be really nice)
New deps on a sub-project seems more palatable, but interested in what
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20007
If we wanted to lock down permissions a bit more, we might consider `750`,
but I'd prefer to make permission changes with more time for testing, maybe for
2.4
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20007
Yes, by default in openshift, containers run as an anonymous uid, and as
group id 0. So there are a few things that need to be given access to gid 0.
I asked some of our security people
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19995
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19995
I'm picking up a few stragglers from `git grep`
```
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/submit/steps/BaseDriverConfigurationStep.scala
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r157274013
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,502 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r157076409
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,502 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r157075744
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,502 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
