Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21693
@HyukjinKwon will this pr be merged into branch-2.3/branch-2.2 too?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21609
Can this pr be merged ASAP? Currently there is an error on branch-2.2 .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21577
@vanzin @tgravescs , after merge this pr into branch-2.2, there is an error
"stageAttemptNumber is not a member of org.apache.spark.TaskContext" in
SparkHadoopMapRedUtil, I think it need
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
@dahaian I think this is the issue of Eclipse, you can open
'JavaConsumerStrategySuite.java' file, remove the '.mapValues' and then retype
'.mapValues' again, save file to recompile
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18470
Hi, @cloud-fan , @hvanhovell , after merging this pr into **branch-2.1**,
there are some errors:
1.
`value WINDOW_EXEC_BUFFER_SPILL_THRESHOLD is not a member of object
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17008
I meet the same error in branch master :
**overriding lazy value sessionState in class SparkSession of type
org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SessionState; lazy value sessionState has weaker
access
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
@srowen after update to master, in Eclipse IDE, there is an error in
JavaConsumerStrategySuite.java line 52:
`final Map<TopicPartition, Long> offsets = new HashMap<>();
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16146
ping @cloud-fan , will this pr be merged into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
It sounds good. @zsxwing could you take a look at this pr? does this pr
plan to be merged into branch-2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
ping @aramesh117
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
@aramesh117 you should update code based on master branch to resovlve
conflicts, and then, jenkins will test this pr automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
ping @zsxwing @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
@aramesh117 @zsxwing @tdas Is there any process at this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
@maver1ck I think you need to open another pr for change in Catalog.scala.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14420
@JoshRosen can you have a look at this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14420
@srowen will this pr be meged into branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
thanks, @mchalek
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
@srowen @mchalek could you open a new pr for master/branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
Hi, @srowen @JoshRosen @mchalek , this issue still exists on
branch-2.0/master, if I add "driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" property to
write.jdbc's properties params, it was ok, otherw
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
@srowen @JoshRosen does this pr need to be merged into master or
branch-2.0 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13196
@zsxwing , why does this pr be reverted in branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
ping @mengxr @yanboliang @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
@HyukjinKwon , just see it, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
@HyukjinKwon , could you revert this pr for branch-1.6 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
@HyukjinKwon OK, but this pr should be reverted first.
@jkbradley could you revert this pr for branch-1.6 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732911
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732825
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732808
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105
@rajeshbalamohan , Is there any progress yet? We meet the same performance
issues when formatting date or operating string-to-date .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
@srowen @JoshRosen @holdenk could you take a look and merge this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-222398286
ping @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-221769197
@JoshRosen , could you merge this into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13196#issuecomment-220470402
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13185#issuecomment-220218127
ï¼ zsxwing will this pr be merged into branch 1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13027#issuecomment-220040626
@davies , could you review this pr and merge it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-219626090
@mchalek @JoshRosen Is there any progress yet? I got the same error with
spark-1.6.1. But if I add "driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" property to
write.jdbc's
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12060#issuecomment-218947787
@markhamstra , thanks for your explaintion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12060#issuecomment-218942375
Good PR, will it plan to be merged into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13027#issuecomment-218647036
ping @davies @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13027#issuecomment-218381595
This pr is great for us, solved some ExecutorLost problems for branch-1.6.
this includes the commit PR #13020 for the branch-1.6 version too?
---
If your project
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13027#issuecomment-218378667
This PR includes the commit PR #13020 for the branch-1.6 version too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12751#issuecomment-217320918
@srowen , add below code twice into branch 1.6:
`if (successful(index)) {`
` logInfo(`
`s"Task ${info.id} in stage ${taskSet.id} (TID
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10024#issuecomment-212790206
sorry, I mistakenly deleted my comment.
what a pity, i can only merge this pr manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10024#issuecomment-212781140
@davies , will this pr be backported to branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#issuecomment-208654680
@davies , but I didn't find this commit in branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#issuecomment-208604888
@davies has this pr cherry-picked into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11331#issuecomment-18851
@davies , cool, i build with maven successfully according to this pr, The
maven command I have used:
mvn clean package -DskipTests -Pscala-2.11 -Phadoop-2.6 -Phive
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#issuecomment-184515856
@chenghao-intel @mwws , sorry for my late reply.
Currently, we just record the kafka offset and accumulators to third-party
storage system after per batch
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#discussion_r51677442
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
3.2.2
2.10.5
--- End diff --
@JoshRosen , why this version is 2.10.5
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#issuecomment-174453565
Hi, @mwws , @chenghao-intel , is there any progress on this pr?
When we use spark streaming, it will lose some stateful data when we
upgrade code, i think this pr
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10633#issuecomment-169571829
@JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-163853516
Hi, @yucai , my code is executed successfully with this pr. It's great.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#issuecomment-161676006
@hvanhovell , thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#issuecomment-161240681
@hvanhovell , is there any progress? will this pr be merged into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#issuecomment-161494736
@hvanhovell , thanks for your replying. Currently, there are some window
statistical reports in our requirement, but without hive environment.
Will this pr be merged
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9800#issuecomment-157918712
It's cool. Will this pr merge into 1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132911504
will this pr be merged into branch-1.5?I need it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132913028
@rxin , thanks for your reply.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8135#issuecomment-131702682
@calvinjia, but this pr has already been merged into branch-1.5?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8135#issuecomment-131685800
@rxin, why did this pr not merged into master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-100752171
Hi @koeninger , of cource, I can read kafka offset from ZK when recovering
by myself, I just want to know that writing to ZK is built-in support or not.
---
If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-100741128
Hi @jerryshao , current spark version is not built-in support for upgrade
and accumulators when recovering from checkpoint, so I want to add kafka offset
to zk, and read
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-100077362
is there any conclusion?
@jerryshao , could it add a config option to decide whether adding zk
offest posting? just my bit suggest:)
---
If your project is set up
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-100087287
is there any conclusion?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5428#issuecomment-96484530
hi, @tdas , why this PR was be reverted?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-95387040
@koeninger , will this RP be merged into 1.4.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-94997887
@koeninger , I test streaming + kakfa 0.8.2.1 with this RP, it works well,
:smile:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5428#issuecomment-95000892
@tdas , I tested streaming recovering from checkpoint with this PR, it
failed if it use accumulators, so this assuredly can't solve [issue
SPARK-5206](https
GitHub user zzcclp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5522
[SPARK-6930][Build]Build with Hive Thrift Server error, because of missing
guava
change scope of dependency guava to default value : compile
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user zzcclp closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5522
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5522#issuecomment-93284488
OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-91130762
@koeninger , I merge this RP into master and build, it is OK. then run
tests as follows:
mvn -Pscala-2.10 -Phadoop-2.3 -Pyarn -Dyarn.version=2.3.0-cdh5.1.2
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5428#issuecomment-91180116
@tdas , can this RP resolve [this
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5206)?
Restart a streaming app from checkpoint incorrectly if using accumulators
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-91084285
there is not any error, why?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-89694634
@koeninger , I can't visit [this
url](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28872/)
, it's 404. ??
---
If your project is set up
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-88331714
@koeninger , no progress yet?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5204#issuecomment-86416823
@witgo , This [PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5198) has resolved
the problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user zzcclp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5200
[SPARK-6547][Tests]Missing import Files in InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
Use org.apache.spark.util.Utils instead of Files
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5200#issuecomment-86364511
It is duplicate [PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5198), close
this, please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user zzcclp closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85877991
@chenghao-intel , can you review again, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85882008
@AmplabJenkins , please re test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85911436
Add a newline at the end of source file, does it need to re test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85925500
@AmplabJenkins , please re test, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85936678
OK, I am new sparker, :smile:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-86305650
@liancheng , I already set my real name on my GitHub *Name* and JIRA *Full
Name*. :smiley:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85805763
@chenghao-intel , I have update the code. can you take a look again. thanks.
@AmplabJenkins , re-test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85768950
@chenghao-intel ,I have update the code. can you take a look again. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85797911
@SparkQA , merge again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85374620
OK, I will modify code and test again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85389879
@chenghao-intel , I change code and test it, the result is the same as last
commit , is 5 minutes.
Please help me for checking code.
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user zzcclp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154
Improve ScalaUdf called performance.
As issue SPARK-6483 description, ScalaUdf is low performance because of
calling *asInstanceOf* to convert per record.
With this, the performance of ScalaUdf
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5154#issuecomment-85353974
Before this change, it takes 17 minutes, and now takes 5 minutes, which is
the same as *HiveContext + udf floor* and *non-udf*
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-82816799
@koeninger , kafka 0.8.2.1 was
[released](https://archive.apache.org/dist/kafka/0.8.2.1/RELEASE_NOTES.html),
can it be upgrade this version?
---
If your project is set
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4977#issuecomment-78462093
OK.:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user zzcclp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4979
[SPARK-6279][Streaming]In KafkaRDD.scala, Miss expressions flag s at
logging string
In KafkaRDD.scala, Miss expressions flag s at logging string
In logging file, it print `Beginning offset
GitHub user zzcclp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4977
[SPARK-6275][Documentation]Miss toDF() function in
docs/sql-programming-guide.md
Miss `toDF()` function in docs/sql-programming-guide.md
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4867#issuecomment-77078291
why to close this RP?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-74193418
Will this RP be merged into 1.3.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4258#issuecomment-71959063
LGTM, I test this with spark-branch 1.2, it works correctly. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
