Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
Merged into master. If there are new comments about the model persistence
compatibility issue, we can address them in follow-up work. Thanks for all your
reviewing.
---
If your project is set
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
looks good. just have some question not specific to this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
**[Test build #71665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71665/testReport)**
for PR 16646 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
cc @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
**[Test build #71665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71665/testReport)**
for PR 16646 at commit
