[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-05-11 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 gentle ping @admackin --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-02-07 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 The core change is looking OK @admackin but seems like it fails Python tests? if you have a moment to look at that, could be all that's needed to get this over the line. --- If your project is set

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-02-04 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3554 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3554/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-02-04 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3554 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3554/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-02-02 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3552 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3552/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-02-02 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3552 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3552/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-30 Thread imatiach-msft
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 looks good to me too. I just added a small suggestion. Thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3551 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3551/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3551 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3551/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-24 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 This is looking OK to me, but it needs a (squash, optionally, and) rebase now before it can test again. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-22 Thread admackin
Github user admackin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 I've addressed all the problems I think – code style now fixed, MLTestingUtils patched (and verified all MLLib test cases still pass), and added a test case for zero-valued labels --- If your

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3544 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3544/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 **[Test build #3544 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3544/testReport)** for PR 16652 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-22 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 It looks like there is no particular reason that `("0", Vectors.dense(0, 2, 3), 0.0)` really needs to set a 0 value as the label. You could make it 1 and see that it still passes all tests. --- If

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-21 Thread admackin
Github user admackin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 Yes that’s right, in MLUtils it supplies zero-labels as test cases (ie assumes they’re allowed, which for other regression algorithms would be true). More than happy to patch that instead

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-21 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 I imagine there's a better way to do this without copying code. Do you mean the common test code assumes 0 labels are permitted? then maybe it should just not do that, because it's just using any

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-20 Thread admackin
Github user admackin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 Yes, the version in MLUtils had labels of zero in the test cases, so was causing test cases to fail after my patch. It didn't look like there was a way to fix this, so I thought it better to make

[GitHub] spark issue #16652: [SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail f...

2017-01-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this