Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73653/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73653/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73653/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73578/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73578/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73578/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Rebased to master and tests updated. @zsxwing would you take another look
when you've got a minute?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73492 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73382/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73382 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73382/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73382 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73382/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73374/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73374/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73374/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Reopening :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
I spoke too soon, sorry! Thinking about it more the deterministic filename
solution is not great as the number of partitions could change for several
reasons.
Given that would you mind
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Using deterministic file names sounds great. Thanks! I'm closing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Thanks for working on this, however I'm not sure if we want to go with this
approach. In Spark 2.2, I think we should consider deprecating the manifest
files and instead use deterministic file
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
@marmbrus @zsxwing would you take a look at this? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
28 matches
Mail list logo
