[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Thanks Marcelo! On Apr 26, 2017 5:06 PM, "Marcelo Vanzin" wrote: > Merging to master / 2.2. > > — > You are receiving this because you

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread vanzin
Github user vanzin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merging to master / 2.2. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Finally it's passing! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76194/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76194 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76194/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76194 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76194/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Jenkins, retest this please. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-26 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 This time it finished on regular time (2h 29m) but failed a test. I ran that test locally (org.apache.spark.streaming.ReceiverSuite's 'receiver life cycle') and it passed for me, so for mostly

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76156/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76156 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76156/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76156 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76156/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Kicking off another run here while I am running a run locally. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Jenkins, retest this please. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Hmm, this is weird, it ran for 4h10 mins and got killed due to a timeout. Looking... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76143/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76143 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76143/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76143 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76143/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-24 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76114/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-24 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-24 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76114 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76114/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-24 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76114 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76114/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-24 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Jenkins, retest this please. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76055/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76054/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76054 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76054/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76055 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76055/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread markgrover
Github user markgrover commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Few decisions that I made here: * I considered if just `sun.java.command` property should be checked and redacted but that seemed to specific and likely a bandaid to the current problem, not

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76054 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76054/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76051/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76051 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76051/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #17725: [SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive...

2017-04-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725 **[Test build #76051 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76051/testReport)** for PR 17725 at commit