Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17808
I think we don't have to back-port. This is a small
improvement/optimization of the original code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17808
merged to master - let me know if you think this should go to 2.2 as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17808
**[Test build #76303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76303/testReport)**
for PR 17808 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76303/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17808
**[Test build #76303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76303/testReport)**
for PR 17808 at commit
