Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78806/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78806 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78806/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78806/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78677/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78677/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78677/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78636/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78636 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78636/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78636 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78636/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78622/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78622 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78622/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78622/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
@cloud-fan ok.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
We need to document clearly what will happen if we have duplicated elements
in a catalyst array and we convert that array to set.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
ah i see your point. Then it makes sense to do so
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
The serialized field after `KryoEncoder` is a binary. So I guess it can't
easily convert between Dataset and DataFrame. You can't convert the result of
`collect_set` to a `Dataset[Set[T]]`.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
why not use `KryoEncoder` for `Set`? Serializing `Set` to catalyst array
loses the set property, and it just becomes a meaningless binary: most of the
array methods are meaningless, e.g. get
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
cc @cloud-fan I'd like to hear your opinion about this `Set` support. Can
you provide some insights?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Currently I can't think of possible issues of serializing `Set` as array.
But welcome comments to point any possible issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78581/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78581/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78581/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78578/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78578/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78578/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
34 matches
Mail list logo
