Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81878/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
**[Test build #81878 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81878/testReport)**
for PR 19135 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
**[Test build #81878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81878/testReport)**
for PR 19135 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Hi @cloud-fan, thanks for reviewing. The code has updated, pls take a look.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81868/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
**[Test build #81868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81868/testReport)**
for PR 19135 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
**[Test build #81868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81868/testReport)**
for PR 19135 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
LGTM except one minor comment
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Hi @jerryshao thanks for your reviewing.
>So it somehow reflects that CPU core contention is the main issue for
memory pre-occupation
I have modified the code, now it will not request
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
So it somehow reflects that CPU core contention is the main issue for
memory pre-occupation , am I right?
AFAIK from our customer, we usually don't allocate so many cores to one
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19135
Hi @cloud-fan , @jiangxb1987 . The follow is the test result, I have
modified the test to server.
2 cores with 150GB memory:
| --| -- | -- |
| before | after |
16 matches
Mail list logo
