Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
**[Test build #84373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84373/testReport)**
for PR 19857 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
**[Test build #84373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84373/testReport)**
for PR 19857 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84372/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
**[Test build #84372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84372/testReport)**
for PR 19857 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
**[Test build #84372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84372/testReport)**
for PR 19857 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19857
@MrBago @jkbradley I think this PR need to be reviewed and merged first,
before reviewing #19627
Because this PR change some critical code path.
---
