Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87405/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #87405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87405/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
I see. I will open a new JIRA tomorrow.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
@kiszk This is unable to merge to 2.3. Could you open a new JIRA for this?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/863/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #87405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87405/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
ping @rednaxelafx
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
ping @rednaxelafx
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87084/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #87084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87084/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #87084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87084/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/605/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87076/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #87076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87076/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #87076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87076/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/598/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
@kiszk For this specific kind of usage, I don't think using a hardcoded
stable ID will be a problem.
The comment we're talking about is the kind the can only appear once in a
single
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
@rednaxelafx I understand your concern when `ctx.registerComment()` is
conditionally called.
If we call `ctx.registerComment()` with the specific identified multiple
times, how do we handle?
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
I gave it a bit more thought. Here's an alternative proposal: instead of
using a "force comment" mechanism in the current form (which still gets a
`ctx.freshName("c")` that the caller has no
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
I did the experiment that I asked about at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419#issuecomment-361359825 , and
verified that under the current implementation, this PR will not affect the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86882/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86882 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86882/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/436/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86882 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86882/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Then, we should add a test case to ensure it will not be broken.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
@gatorsmile Not directly. The `CodeAndComment` case class is just a
"container", it doesn't handle what gets into the `body` field. When we force
embed a comment, it'll leave a comment as a
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
@rednaxelafx Does the following
[codes](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala#L1286-L1294)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86774/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86774/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
@kiszk SGTM and LGTM. Let's ship it!
One more question on the side: with the `forceComment = true`, are we fully
sure that won't affect the equality of `CodeAndComment`?
The whole
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86774/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
I always leave the comment regardless of the
`spark.sql.codegen.useIdInClassName` for a unified way to access the ID from
the comment.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/341/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
LGTM, and +1 on @viirya 's idea. I like it better for the comment to be on
top of the class declaration instead of inside it; but I'm okay either way if
others have strong opinion otherwise. As
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86745/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86745/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86745/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/316/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
ping @rednaxelafx
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
52 matches
Mail list logo