Github user WenqianZhao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
> @WenqianZhao I think the point of sending deltas instead of absolute
ranks was that, as parts of the graph converge, their deltas would go to zero.
GraphX would then be able to compress those
Github user ankurdave commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
@WenqianZhao I think the point of sending deltas instead of absolute ranks
was that, as parts of the graph converge, their deltas would go to zero. GraphX
would then be able to stop sending those
Github user WenqianZhao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
By the way, @ankurdave , hi, I'm very curious about why you use delta
instead of just newPR as the message. Is that for better performance or just at
chance? Could you please answer this
Github user WenqianZhao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
You can check the
[comment](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2100#issuecomment-53311125) in
pull request [#2100](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2100).
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional