Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Sure @lrytz can have a second look on this, also it needs to be battle
tested.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Yes we need to also create a 2.12 build of Spark in 2.4. We might still
have to label it "beta" as I still kind of suspect there's a corner case
lurking here. I can't speak for 3.0, but would assume
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@srowen thanks! So 2.12 will be optional for Spark 2.4? And the major
version for Spark 3.0?
What is the plan?
---
-
To
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@srowen gentle ping.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93916/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93916/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93915/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93915/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93916/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93915/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@srowen I think its ok now. Ready to go.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93879/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93879 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93879/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@srowen that is my understanding too and yes they are erased AFAIK, but
just in case I tried it...
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
I can imagine it is binary-compatible because the change is just to generic
types, that are erased here (no ClassTags or anything).
To be clear about source compatibility, do I have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93879/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93878 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93878/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93878/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@srowen I updated the PR with the minor fixes.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93878/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@felixcheung I tested with this simple program with Scala 2.11. The app jar
was built against the officially released artifacts (2.3.1):
```
val spark = SparkSession
.builder
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@felixcheung AFAIK as stated (@lrytz) in the doc it shouldnt be. It can be
tested I guess.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
I think that's binary-incompatible breaking API change, right?
ex.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930/files#diff-2b8f0f66fe5397b169d0f754e99da8d5R64
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Yeah I would not worry about it
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
> `logDebug(s\" + cloning the object $obj of class $`
Is this normal?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93828/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93828 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93828/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
cc @JoshRosen too
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@lrytz @retronym @adriaanm @srowen @felixcheung fyi, pls review.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
**[Test build #93828 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93828/testReport)**
for PR 21930 at commit
Github user holdensmagicalunicorn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21930
@skonto, thanks! I am a bot who has found some folks who might be able to
help with the review:@pwendell, @cloud-fan and @mateiz
---
47 matches
Mail list logo
