Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
I'm going to say let's leave this alone for now then if there isn't
consensus. We can easily reopen later if someone wanted to just add the JARs.
---
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
I'm totally on the user's standpoint, compared to ship these slim jars, it
would be better to ship the assembly jars, as those jars can be used directly
by adding to Spark's runtime. For these
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
There's no policy stating you have to release all code as binary bits; it
just seemed coherent to do so. It isn't a behavior change as it doesn't add
anything to the jars/ directory, and won't
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
From user's point, I don't think it is useful compared to pulling from
maven repo, the provided jar alone is of no use. But if there's an Apache
policy to release all the binaries, then I'm OK
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94700/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
**[Test build #94700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94700/testReport)**
for PR 22084 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
**[Test build #94700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94700/testReport)**
for PR 22084 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
To maybe summarize: what this isn't doing is actually making these external
modules available on the classpath for standalone mode. That would be a
reasonable goal, as it would make standalone mode
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
+1
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
This script isn't exercised in the tests anyway, so the result is not
meaningful. I manually tested it.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94648/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22084
**[Test build #94648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94648/testReport)**
for PR 22084 at commit
16 matches
Mail list logo
