Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
The tests are failing because they're now using too much direct memory:
```
18/08/17 09:57:35.396 rpc-server-4647-3 WARN TransportChannelHandler:
Exception in connection from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94900/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
**[Test build #94900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94900/testReport)**
for PR 22114 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
FYI I wrote a small micro bench to pound on the pool in both the old way
(mixed on heap and off heap allocations) and new way (only off heap) and it
actually seems faster if all allocations use the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
**[Test build #94900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94900/testReport)**
for PR 22114 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user NiharS commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
They pass on my machine :(
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94867/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
**[Test build #94867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94867/testReport)**
for PR 22114 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
**[Test build #94867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94867/testReport)**
for PR 22114 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user NiharS commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Tried with a significantly larger input, both with and without the change.
They ran in just about the same time.
---
-
To
Github user NiharS commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Working on a better test now! With my small program there was definitely no
noticeable change in runtime. The memory monitor was running too, though, so I
did have some external factors. I'll try
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Did you get a chance to measure whether this has any negative effect of
performance? Since it's using a buffer pool I wouldn't expect any, but you
never know...
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22114
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
20 matches
Mail list logo
