Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98007/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #98007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98007/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #98007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98007/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #4396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4396/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user daviddingly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
> Thank you for your first contribution, @daviddingly
> Could you [create issues
ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK) first and change the pr
title to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #4396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4396/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Whoa, never seen a JVM crash like that!
```
[CodeBlob (0x7f6fc018add0)]
Framesize: 2
Runtime Stub (0x7f6fc018add0): handle_exception_from_callee Runtime1
stub
Could
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #97997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97997/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97997/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #97997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97997/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #4395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4395/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #4395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4395/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
OK, I ran an SBT test earlier and indeed it's kind of a glaring warning. I
think I've changed my mind, if it does harmonize versions and avoid a warning,
OK.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97913/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
**[Test build #97913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97913/testReport)**
for PR 22803 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Yea, similar opinion. If it does not fix an actual problem, I wouldn't
encourage to fix too ..
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
What does this affect, though? those are just nullability annotations and
don't result in behavior changes in the code, at all right? I don't know if
it's worth managing them to the same version.
23 matches
Mail list logo
