Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
**[Test build #98038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98038/testReport)**
for PR 22817 at commit
Github user peter-toth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
I will try to investigate a bit more come up with an other solution.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user peter-toth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
So based on the UT results it seems that simply changing the resolution to
bottom-up causes issues with `LambdaFunction`s in the current version of Spark.
The issue seems to be a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97985/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
**[Test build #97985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97985/testReport)**
for PR 22817 at commit
Github user peter-toth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Thanks @gatorsmile , I thought the issue in SPARK-25816 and in the added UT
is because the top-down. I thought that `UnresolvedExtractValue(child,
fieldExpr) if child.resolved` could be resolved
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
This would not work, since we need both bottom-up and top-down. You would
hit the test failure.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
**[Test build #97985 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97985/testReport)**
for PR 22817 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
@peter-toth what are you trying to fix here? Could you add this to the PR
description?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
14 matches
Mail list logo
