Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-155050652
Merged to master/1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154834406
**[Test build #2011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2011/consoleFull)**
for PR 9432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154830736
**[Test build #2007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2007/consoleFull)**
for PR 9432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154852699
**[Test build #2011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2011/consoleFull)**
for PR 9432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154821359
**[Test build #2007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2007/consoleFull)**
for PR 9432 at commit
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154740151
Oops my bad, also removed the unnecessary sbin/../ from the other tachyon
paths
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154003198
**[Test build #1984 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1984/consoleFull)**
for PR 9432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154038797
**[Test build #1984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1984/consoleFull)**
for PR 9432 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#discussion_r44003082
--- Diff: sbin/start-master.sh ---
@@ -23,6 +23,26 @@ if [ -z "${SPARK_HOME}" ]; then
export SPARK_HOME="$(cd "`dirname "$0"`"/..; pwd)"
fi
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154130413
use SPARK_HOME instead of FWDIR, also changed tachyon check to use
SPARK_HOME
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-154179761
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-153689478
Sorry @CharlesYeh this has a merge conflict now. Could you rebase?
Basically the scripts have just changed to use a different constructor for
finding the working
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-153452389
This LGTM being basically a copy of the existing approach in
`start-thriftserver.sh` et al. It does not appear to interfere with any
existing usage of the scripts since
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-153446371
Changed it to ./sbin/start-worker.sh and ./sbin/start-master.sh
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9432#issuecomment-153362113
Could you change `Usage: Worker [options] ` and `Usage: Master
[options]` to be the scripts' names themselves not the cryptic Master and
Worker?
---
If your
16 matches
Mail list logo
