Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222602457
cc @jkbradley / @mengxr are we ok with changing the API?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222343969
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222343970
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222343951
**[Test build #59578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59578/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222341365
**[Test build #59578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59578/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64997106
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64997103
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64997097
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64996988
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64996971
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64996960
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222337714
@dongjoon-hyun Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222337348
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Personally, I love this PR. :)
I just hesitated to change the function signatures of MLLIB in #13352 .
---
If your project is set up
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222335661
@dongjoon-hyun @andrewor14 This PR removes `SQLContext` from `MLlib`. Let
me know if we should keep it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222328340
@rxin `SQLContext` is not being used in the `MLlib` test suites. Thus, this
PR is just to use the latest `SparkSession` to replace the existing
`SQLContext` in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222318813
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222318814
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222318770
**[Test build #59562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59562/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222313642
**[Test build #59562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59562/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380
[SPARK-15644] [MLlib] [SQL] Replace SQLContext with SparkSession in MLlib
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to use the latest `SparkSession` to replace the
20 matches
Mail list logo
