Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
@srowen : In case of exception, we `destroy()` the `proc` which cleans up
all the associated streams :
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69301324
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GeneratorFunctionSuite.scala ---
@@ -89,4 +91,30 @@ class GeneratorFunctionSuite extends QueryTest
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69301056
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/GeneratorExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,4 +69,23 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69301097
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/GeneratorExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,4 +69,23 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69300935
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/GeneratorExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,4 +69,23 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69300771
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -195,3 +195,42 @@ case class Explode(child:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69300727
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -195,3 +195,42 @@ case class Explode(child:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976#discussion_r69300459
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -195,3 +195,42 @@ case class Explode(child:
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981
@MechCoder Thanks for adding this! I think it's a good test to protect
against silent failures in the future. I just left a few small comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981#discussion_r69298953
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +108,15 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuite
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981#discussion_r69298648
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +108,15 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuite
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
@srowen Done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61615/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981#discussion_r69298384
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +108,15 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61614/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61615/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
**[Test build #61614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61614/consoleFull)**
for PR 14010 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61616/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
@rdblue Verified that parquet-avro also suffers from this issue. Filed
[PARQUET-651][1] to track it.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-651
---
If your project is set up
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
@srowen Yes, the example code is exactly the same as those in graphx doc,
and I test them all, can run normally.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #61616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61616/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69297640
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,43 @@ class
Github user janplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
@rxin and @dongjoon-hyun Thanks for your review.
I have add a new commit which does following things:
1. Put `parse_url` function in the right order.
2. Use `""" """` instead of `+`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61613/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
**[Test build #61613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61613/consoleFull)**
for PR 14010 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13136
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
No changes to the code itself (except perhaps style fixes)? OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61610/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61612/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61610/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
**[Test build #61612 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61612/consoleFull)**
for PR 14013 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
@holden that's true for the fully generic approach. But `DataFrameWriter`
for example exposes `json` as a shortcut (type-safe in a way) for
`format("json")`.
I think we can achieve something
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61618/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
**[Test build #61618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61618/consoleFull)**
for PR 14015 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
**[Test build #61618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61618/consoleFull)**
for PR 14015 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
**[Test build #61617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61617/consoleFull)**
for PR 14015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61617/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
**[Test build #61617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61617/consoleFull)**
for PR 14015 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14015
[SPARK-16345][Documentation][Examples][GraphX] Extract graphx programming
guide example snippets from source files instead of hard code them
## What changes were proposed in this pull
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
@rdblue Would you mind to help review this one? My initial investigation
suggested that parquet-avro probably suffers the same issue. Will file a
parquet-mr JIRA ticket soon.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #61616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61616/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
[SPARK-16344][SQL] Decoding Parquet array of struct with a single field
named "element"
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR ports #14013 to master and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
cc @rxin and @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Thank you, @cloud-fan . :) I've learn a lot in this PR again.
The followings are applied.
- Use `inputArray.getStruct(i, ncol)`
- Keep the original field name
- Fix
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61615/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13925
I think the important change regards the transaction isolation level that's
in effect here, but yes that change is also a good one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61611/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
**[Test build #61611 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61611/consoleFull)**
for PR 14013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
**[Test build #61614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61614/consoleFull)**
for PR 14010 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
**[Test build #61613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61613/consoleFull)**
for PR 14010 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
**[Test build #61612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61612/consoleFull)**
for PR 14013 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
**[Test build #61611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61611/consoleFull)**
for PR 14013 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013#discussion_r69283877
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystRowConverter.scala
---
@@ -481,13 +481,106 @@
Github user jurriaan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13374#discussion_r69283761
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVSuite.scala
---
@@ -366,6 +366,32 @@ class CSVSuite extends QueryTest
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
[SPARK-16344][SQL] Decoding Parquet array of struct with a single field
named "element"
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Please refer to [SPARK-16344][1] for details
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61603/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14010
**[Test build #61603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61603/consoleFull)**
for PR 14010 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61607/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61607/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61608/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61608/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61609/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61609/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user maver1ck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13925
@srowen
Maybe we should change this condition to
`conn.getMetaData().supportsTransactions()` ?
I can prepare PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61610 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61610/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894#discussion_r69281183
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ private[ml] trait CrossValidatorParams extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13389#discussion_r69280087
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystWriteSupport.scala
---
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@
Github user jurriaan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13374#discussion_r69279736
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -745,6 +748,8 @@ def csv(self, path, mode=None, compression=None,
sep=None, quote=None, escape=No
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69276506
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,43 @@ class
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69276469
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -653,6 +655,128 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
cc @liancheng @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
[SPARK-16343][SQL] Improve the PushDownPredicate rule to pushdown preâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently our Optimizer may reorder the predicates to run
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61609 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61609/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14002
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61605/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14002
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
@cloud-fan I have updated with your branch code. Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14002
**[Test build #61605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61605/consoleFull)**
for PR 14002 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13919
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13919
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61608/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#discussion_r69267676
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -19,37 +19,105 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61607/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
301 - 400 of 490 matches
Mail list logo
