Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14061
LGTM, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
**[Test build #61833 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61833/consoleFull)**
for PR 14063 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #61836 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61836/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778#discussion_r69699166
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -346,14 +346,47 @@ case class
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
@cloud-fan Probably not? `CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand` uses
`InsertIntoTable`, which is translated into `InsertIntoHiveTable`, which
requires a `MetastoreRelation`.
---
If your project is
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778#discussion_r69698991
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -346,14 +346,38 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
ok. 3 failed tests remaining...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13890#discussion_r69698497
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -74,13 +74,71 @@ object RDDConversions {
}
}
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61828 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61828/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61828/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Thanks @srowen for pointing out this pr, I'm not sure how many changes need
to be back-ported into 1.6, can you please file a patch to 1.6 branch to
upgrade maven? Seems currently it blocks 1.6
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Hi, @cloud-fan . I've updated the PR. The following is a summary of changes.
- To support `sentence('', null, null)`, `Sentences` extends `Expression`
instead of `TerneryExpression`.
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14066
**[Test build #61835 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61835/consoleFull)**
for PR 14066 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014#discussion_r69696837
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRowConverter.scala
---
@@ -482,13 +482,104 @@ private[parquet]
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14066
[MINOR] [BUILD] Download Maven 3.3.9 instead of 3.3.3 because the latter is
no longer published on Apache mirrors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Download Maven 3.3.9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61834 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61834/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Oh, I imagine they finally cleaned out the old 3.3.x binaries from the
mirrors. I think it's best to update branch-1.6 to refer to Maven 3.3.9 in the
build. It was done for 2.0/master in
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
@cloud-fan Thank you for your review.
I thought the problem is the schema would change after serialized by the
`RowEncoder` because the schema after serialization will be retrieved from the
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Looks like this url
(https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua?action=download=/maven/maven-3/3.3.3/binaries/apache-maven-3.3.3-bin.tar.gz)
to download maven is 404 not found.
Tried with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61824/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
**[Test build #61824 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61824/consoleFull)**
for PR 14053 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
**[Test build #61833 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61833/consoleFull)**
for PR 14063 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
**[Test build #61830 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61830/consoleFull)**
for PR 14065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61830/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
@rxin It seems theses are all instances related with this (I can't
believe!). I just simply corrected indentation for a doc-test in `mllib`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61831/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #61831 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61831/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61832 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61832/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #61831 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61831/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13941
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
**[Test build #61830 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61830/consoleFull)**
for PR 14065 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
[SPARK-16342][YARN][WIP] Add a configurable token manager for Spark running
on YARN
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a configurable token manager for Spark on
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13941
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61828 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61828/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61829 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61829/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14060
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61827 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61827/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950#discussion_r69690304
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -502,6 +502,9 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13982
I don't feel strongly about it. It's something easy to revisit later to
change if it turns out special-casing this is undesirable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14054
I'm reluctant to add yet another (undocumented) config for another
behavior. Still, it's not that big a deal. My question is: is there a good
reason to employ `SERIALIZABLE`? it means only one
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14064
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14064
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61823/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14064
**[Test build #61823 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61823/consoleFull)**
for PR 14064 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61821/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #61821 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61821/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61826/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
**[Test build #61826 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61826/consoleFull)**
for PR 14063 at commit
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13708
Thanks, @zsxwing . I have fixed them in the commit above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gurvindersingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950#discussion_r69688222
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -502,6 +502,9 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61825/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
**[Test build #61825 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61825/consoleFull)**
for PR 14063 at commit
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13922
Seems the `numFeatures` property is repeated in all these classification
and regression classes. What about adding a `HasNumFeatures` mixin class and
move the `numFeatures` property implementation
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Sure! Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
If you can please check other modules too. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user janplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
Resolve conflicts with master.
cc @cloud-fan , is there any more question about this pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
**[Test build #61826 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61826/consoleFull)**
for PR 14063 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13941
**[Test build #61822 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61822/consoleFull)**
for PR 13941 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13941
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
I just double-checked the built documentation after the last commit. Do you
want me to give a pass for other modules (maybe in another PR)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13941
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61822/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
**[Test build #61825 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61825/consoleFull)**
for PR 14063 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61818/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61818 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61818/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13708
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13708
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61817/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61819/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13708
**[Test build #61817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61817/consoleFull)**
for PR 13708 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #61819 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61819/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61815/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #61815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61815/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61816/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61816/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
**[Test build #61824 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61824/consoleFull)**
for PR 14053 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
cc @dongjoon-hyun to take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14063
Can you scan the Python docs and see if there are more instances?
http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.0-rc2-docs/api/python/pyspark.sql.html
I found at least
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14064
**[Test build #61823 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61823/consoleFull)**
for PR 14064 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13982
@srowen any more feedback?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Thanks for the feedback. I will update this later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
I brought this up to date. Any comments on the pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14064
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14064
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61820/
Test FAILed.
---
601 - 700 of 736 matches
Mail list logo
