Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61975/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #61975 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61975/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
@AmplabJenkins I dont know i just create the issue on JIRA and make changes
and make pull request for merge , I think it is valid pull request because in
real world all application need non
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70047707
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
GitHub user phalodi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Add Asynchronous Actions documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Asynchronous Actions documentation inside action of programming guide
## How
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14020
I'm not familiar with this part, cc @liancheng to take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
**[Test build #61976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61976/consoleFull)**
for PR 14087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61977 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61977/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Oops. You already did. Thank you, @cloud-fan .
And, thank you, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Hi, @cloud-fan .
Could you merge this `sentences` PR, too?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087#discussion_r70045502
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/DataStreamReader.scala
---
@@ -281,6 +281,31 @@ final class DataStreamReader
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70045387
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61973/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61973 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61973/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61969/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
Oh, sorry, @petermaxlee .
It seems we are calling `Utils.classForName(className)` three places.
Could we do that once? I'll leave a comment about this in code, too.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61969/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075
Nice catch! The fix LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075#discussion_r70044038
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +82,34 @@ class DefaultSource
}
}
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087#discussion_r70044030
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -331,6 +331,24 @@ class FileStreamSourceSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61972/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087#discussion_r70043723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/DataStreamReader.scala
---
@@ -281,6 +281,31 @@ final class DataStreamReader
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61972 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61972/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14103
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14103
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087#discussion_r70043361
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/DataStreamReader.scala
---
@@ -281,6 +281,31 @@ final class DataStreamReader
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61974/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
Hi, @petermaxlee .
Sorry for late response.
LGTM except three minor style changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61974/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61968/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #61968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61968/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14103
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61966/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14103
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14103
**[Test build #61966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61966/consoleFull)**
for PR 14103 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70042656
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Unfortunately I'm having network issue here and failed to fetch the branch
from GitHub :(
@cloud-fan Could you please help merge this one? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70042360
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70042265
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Definitely, it's my bad. I should spend more time to make a reasonable
scenario from the first.
Thank you, @liancheng , @cloud-fan , @gatorsmile .
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61963/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61963/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Thanks for the examples. This makes sense and LGTM now. Merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
**[Test build #3170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3170/consoleFull)**
for PR 14099 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61967/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #61967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61967/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
is it a typo in PR title? `currectly` -> `correctly `
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61965/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
**[Test build #61965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61965/consoleFull)**
for PR 14095 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012#discussion_r70039722
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1106,21 +1106,32 @@ object PushDownPredicate
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
@gatorsmile Does it make sense to you? I inserted SQL case for you. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
Hi, @rxin .
It's ready for review again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Hi, All. Here is a better example.
I'll update the PR description with this.
Thank you, all.
**Target Scenario**
```scala
scala> val dsView1 =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61964/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #61964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61964/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61962/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
**[Test build #61962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61962/consoleFull)**
for PR 14095 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
the code LGTM. @kiszk can you improve the PR description to explain more
about the new format? And can you comment on the benchmark result in the
benchmark file with benchmark result before your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61961/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #61961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61961/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r70037559
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,154 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61959/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
**[Test build #61959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61959/consoleFull)**
for PR 14071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61960/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #61960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61960/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
By the way, this PR is about improving the existing `CollapseRepartition`,
not about introducing new one. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14097
hi @srowen do you mind have a look at this one? very minor changes...
thank you :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
LGTM except one minor comment, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Hi, @cloud-fan , @liancheng , @gatorsmile .
We can imagine some data sciences environment having many predefined
system-wide tables or datasets. But, here, I simplify that into an
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r70036066
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,154 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61971/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #61971 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61971/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #61975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61975/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70035305
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61970/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61958/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #61958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61958/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #61970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61970/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
301 - 400 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
