Github user paragpc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
thanks @squito :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97586026
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1193,7 +1193,14 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97417513
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +648,69 @@ class BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97417399
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +648,69 @@ class BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97406162
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1218,7 +1225,9 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661
**[Test build #71937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71937/testReport)**
for PR 16661 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71935/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
**[Test build #71938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71938/testReport)**
for PR 16690 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71939/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661
**[Test build #71937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71937/testReport)**
for PR 16661 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71936/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r97580048
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaUserDefinedTypedAggregation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71937/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
yes. but please see my other comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gmoehler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
@viirya Which comment are you referring to? I thought i had included all of
them ;-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
No the question is whether you tested without @viirya commit `b1ef9ec` (the
last one that forces spills of in-memory maps), or just the very last version
of the patch.
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71940/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #71941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71941/testReport)**
for PR 14702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71933/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r97590536
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaUserDefinedTypedAggregation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile Could you please trigger a test for this. Not
sure why the last run didn't succeed. Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71936/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
**[Test build #71933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71933/testReport)**
for PR 16693 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71935/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r97589440
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaUserDefinedTypedAggregation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
cc @vanzin @zsxwing
(I was going to make a longer comment about removing `askWithRetry` and
whether we need another method, but then saw the comments on the referenced PR
-- I'll defer to
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97610826
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -274,25 +277,28 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97610759
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -337,17 +350,20 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582
> Why not simply remove old redirect handler like collection.removeHandler ?
I find it cleaner to just not do something that to do it then have to undo
things when they fail.
---
If your
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97493826
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1177,6 +1177,9 @@ test_that("column functions", {
c17 <- cov(c, c1) + cov("c", "c1") +
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71918/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
The failed test is `udf5.q` in `HiveComparisonTest`, but I can't find
`SELECT to_date('2001-10-30 10:30:00', '')` in it, can you point out where we
write such a test?
---
If your project is set
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97492412
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97499446
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -272,6 +277,10 @@ class GaussianMixture private (
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
(I might be wrong but was suspecting that it returns `NA` first as
`logical` when we collect via `SerDe.scala` and then it ends up `numeric` due
to the type coercion when `NA` is located first
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
@anabranch right, since there is little work done on the R side and this is
mostly a pass through, just checking if the functions are callable without
error like the test you have added should
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71923/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #71924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71924/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97492683
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1746,7 +1750,7 @@ setMethod("toRadians",
#' to_date(df$c)
#' to_date(df$c, '-MM-dd')
#' }
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
**[Test build #71922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71922/testReport)**
for PR 16606 at commit
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
ping @rxin @gatorsmile @tejasapatil @viirya
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Reviving after a hiatus. Updated since tags. I've actually recently come
across a number of users hitting this issue in production and are unable to use
ALS with cross-validation as a result.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71926/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Oh @felixcheung , I was writing a comment but I just saw you. I was looking
into this for my curiosity.
Isn't this due to R type coercion rule with POSIXlt?
```r
>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
**[Test build #71927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71927/testReport)**
for PR 16676 at commit
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97500817
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
LGTM. @zhengruifeng did you manage to add a JIRA for exposing multi-col
support in SparkR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97492569
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ case class CreateTempViewUsing(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97492625
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ case class CreateTempViewUsing(
}
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16663
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16663
merged to master and 2.1.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user samkum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
Hi,
No, I havent test this with out the ExternalAppendOnlyMap fix if this is
what you are asking. I tested it with changes to both the classes:
TaskMemoryManager and
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97498043
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -20,13 +20,15 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql
import
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97498083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Thanks! I can verify this case and the fix.
Could you please add some tests for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97498057
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71916/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71920/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71921/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71917/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71912/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71919/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907
We exposed `JdbcUtils.resultSetToRows`, but forgot to add a test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71925/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97503434
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97503551
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tcondie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16686#discussion_r97620911
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.sql.sources.DataSourceRegister
---
@@ -1 +1 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16685
**[Test build #71943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71943/testReport)**
for PR 16685 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16377
LGTM
Thanks!
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16377
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16377
Thanks @jkbradley!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16685#discussion_r97619926
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -722,14 +724,246 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71941/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r97622188
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user ilganeli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16685
@gatorsmile What is a "key" update and in what context would that sort of
operation be needed?
I don't think a secondary index on the table prevent this method from
working, the primary
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16694
cc @hhbyyh Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16694
**[Test build #71945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71945/testReport)**
for PR 16694 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16694
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16694
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71945/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
