Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r110699779
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2167,6 +2167,61 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(data,
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110717717
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0")
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591#discussion_r110692150
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileIndexSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,6 +221,32 @@ class FileIndexSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591#discussion_r110692271
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileStatusCache.scala
---
@@ -94,27 +94,46 @@ private class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17566
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
**[Test build #75664 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75664/testReport)**
for PR 17330 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
@cloud-fan Good to see what plan is generated in your comment. People
(especially I) will forgot what plan we generated in the future.
When I saw the comment in `upCastToExpectedType`, I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
**[Test build #75665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75665/testReport)**
for PR 17591 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #75666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75666/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17566
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r110693397
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -59,6 +58,13 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #75667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75667/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r110685760
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17593
I agree with @srowen we left it that way since sorting can change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17520
**[Test build #75668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75668/testReport)**
for PR 17520 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r110693499
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2167,6 +2167,61 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(data,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17364
@squito Is this ready to go in? Like I warned, I'm not going to add tests
for this, not on its own
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17550
We do not add the new things into 1.6 branch. Please open the PR using the
master branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480#discussion_r110716862
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -249,7 +249,14 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110713910
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75662/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
**[Test build #75662 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75662/testReport)**
for PR 17592 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #75667 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75667/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75667/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436#discussion_r110714213
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends Cloneable
with Logging
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591#discussion_r110692833
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileStatusCache.scala
---
@@ -94,27 +94,46 @@ private class
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r110692936
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2167,6 +2167,61 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(data,
Github user BenFradet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
ping @jkbradley if you could take a look, that'd be great.
If you have the time, there is also the #17431 segue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75666/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #75666 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75666/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110712166
--- Diff: docs/ml-tuning.md ---
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ for multiclass problems. The default metric used to
choose the best `ParamMap` c
method in each
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
Should this go into branch-2.1 as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
**[Test build #75664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75664/testReport)**
for PR 17330 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17595
**[Test build #75671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75671/testReport)**
for PR 17595 at commit
Github user umehrot2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17445
@kayousterhout @mridulm @rxin @lins05 Can you take a look at this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
**[Test build #75673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75673/testReport)**
for PR 17597 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
LGTM, for fixing the issue with the test. We should separately decide if
this is really the behavior we want for the commit log.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
**[Test build #75672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75672/testReport)**
for PR 17596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75672/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
**[Test build #75672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75672/testReport)**
for PR 17596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75673/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17595
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75671/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17595
**[Test build #75671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75671/testReport)**
for PR 17595 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17595
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495#discussion_r110722790
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -320,14 +321,15 @@ private[history] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
**[Test build #75665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75665/testReport)**
for PR 17591 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
Write the log first to fix a race contion in tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the following failure:
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError:
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110741246
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -327,3 +345,104 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17598
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594#discussion_r110735241
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110742657
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -218,28 +220,44 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
**[Test build #75670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75670/testReport)**
for PR 17594 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
cc @rxin @davies @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
[SPARK-12837][SQL] reduce the serialized size of accumulator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When sending accumulator updates back to driver, the network overhead is
GitHub user superbobry opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17598
[SPARK-20284][CORE] Make {Des,S}erializationStream extend Closeable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows to use `SerializationStream` and
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110740755
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17520
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75668/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17520
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75669/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495#discussion_r110721933
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -571,6 +572,34 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75664/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110742361
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -327,3 +345,104 @@ object
Github user nihavend commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Thank you very much all of you for all your efforts. Sometimes, facing the
same issue different platforms and looking for a way to set jvm options for
locale explicitly. But many times there is no
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17566
Thank you @hvanhovell.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
[SPARK-20285][Tests]Increase the pyspark streaming test timeout to 30
seconds
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Saw the following failure locally:
```
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17595
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17591
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17520
**[Test build #75668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75668/testReport)**
for PR 17520 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
Thanks! Merging to master, 2.1 and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
> user configured with "spark.admin.acls" (or group) or
"spark.ui.view.acls" (or group), or the user who started SHS could list all the
applications, otherwise none of them can be listed
So
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75669/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594#discussion_r110735710
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ class StreamExecution(
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17595
[SPARK-20283][SQL] Add preOptimizationBatches
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently have postHocOptimizationBatches, but not
preOptimizationBatches. This patch adds
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16347
is this still a problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17597
**[Test build #75673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75673/testReport)**
for PR 17597 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546
**[Test build #75674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75674/testReport)**
for PR 17546 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594#discussion_r110760826
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75669/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
**[Test build #75670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75670/testReport)**
for PR 17594 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75670/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17594
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
