Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123409299
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MathExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -644,4 +645,36 @@ class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123401878
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -631,3 +631,109 @@ abstract class TernaryExpression
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300#discussion_r123411528
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1764,6 +1765,70 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382
**[Test build #78419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78419/testReport)**
for PR 18382 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17139
Please bring this PR up to date, then maybe some guy can review this. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18381
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18381
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18381
**[Test build #78414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78414/testReport)**
for PR 18381 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382
cc @felixcheung, could you take a look and see if it is as you intended in
the JIRA?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382#discussion_r123406735
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -295,6 +295,23 @@ setCheckpointDirSC <- function(sc, dirName) {
invisible(callJMethod(sc, "setCheckpointDir",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382
**[Test build #78419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78419/testReport)**
for PR 18382 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
**[Test build #78420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78420/testReport)**
for PR 18118 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18382
[SPARK-21149][R] Add job description API for R
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extend `setJobDescription` to SparkR API.
## How was this patch tested?
Github user naliazheli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18362
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371#discussion_r123404351
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1405,18 +1309,12 @@ setMethod("sha1",
column(jc)
})
-#' signum
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371#discussion_r123404096
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -34,6 +34,30 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(cbind(model = rownames(mtcars), mtcars))}
NULL
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
**[Test build #78417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78417/testReport)**
for PR 18118 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78417/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
**[Test build #78418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78418/testReport)**
for PR 17713 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
**[Test build #78416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78416/testReport)**
for PR 18327 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
**[Test build #78417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78417/testReport)**
for PR 18118 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
@gatorsmile Just rebased. Thanks !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371#discussion_r123403295
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1405,18 +1309,12 @@ setMethod("sha1",
column(jc)
})
-#' signum
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114
I think it's just the new public class detection thing that
- doesn't handle R code at all
- is confused by a code line starting with the word `class` some where
---
If your project is
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17139
@jiangxb1987 ,Yes do you have any questions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114#discussion_r123402476
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2458,111 +2441,78 @@ setMethod("instr", signature(y = "Column", x =
"character"),
column(jc)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378#discussion_r123399287
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1721,7 +1721,8 @@ def toPandas(self):
15Bob
"""
import
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
@jerryshao Could you find some time to look at this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
@dilipbiswal Could you resolve the conflict?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
**[Test build #78412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78412/testReport)**
for PR 18253 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18281
Catching up here, it sounds like the current recommendations (which I'm on
board with) are to:
* Switch to Futures, including using sameThreadExecutor for the case of
parallelism=1
* Try
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18362
**[Test build #78415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78415/testReport)**
for PR 18362 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18362
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18381
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18381
**[Test build #78414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78414/testReport)**
for PR 18381 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18381
[SPARK-21167][SS]Decode the path generated by File sink to handle special
characters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Decode the path generated by File sink to handle
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
**[Test build #78413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78413/testReport)**
for PR 18366 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78413/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
**[Test build #78413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78413/testReport)**
for PR 18366 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9162
Thank you @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
I will actually take it back. This could be checked and done in a followup
(inclusing doc update). I see this PR is already quite big.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
BTW should we need to update `setup.py` too?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78405/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
**[Test build #78405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78405/testReport)**
for PR 17471 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378#discussion_r123384341
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2274,6 +2274,21 @@ def count_bucketed_cols(names,
table="pyspark_bucket"):
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
also, see my message to the dev@ list. jenkins is up, but not reachable
via the amplab link.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM, shane knapp â
wrote:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
it was actually a cut power line due to street construction. apparently
power is back online, and we're waiting for machines and switches to finish
booting back up.
i'm WFH
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378#discussion_r123380675
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2274,6 +2274,21 @@ def count_bucketed_cols(names,
table="pyspark_bucket"):
Github user bOOm-X closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18004
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bOOm-X commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18004
yes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bOOm-X commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
> Well, you could use an ArrayBlockingQueue. Then no extra object is
allocated either.
Yes I agree. But you get the synchronization too. I am still agree that it
should not have a big
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
Thanks @ueshin!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18357
can we change SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler to class and create instance in
each daemons main() with the constructor flag whether to kill the process for
Exceptions or not? Something like
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
Thanks! merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049#discussion_r123376328
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -272,6 +276,11 @@ def test_explode(self):
self.assertEqual(result[0][0], "a")
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18357
@devaraj-kavali SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler is a singleton so you cannot
get the configuration from SparkConf.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
**[Test build #78412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78412/testReport)**
for PR 18253 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
I think the power is still out in the CS building at Berkeley because of
the earthquake, so I'm guessing Jenkins is down as a result (note that even the
vanilla AMP website doesn't work:
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18357
@zsxwing Thanks for looking into this, I see SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler
exits the process for all the exceptions/errors.
Can we modify SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler in such a way
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
@shaneknapp, @sameeragarwal - Not able to access the jenkins build link-
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78405/testReport,
something wrong with the jenkins
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114
@felixcheung Any idea what this message means?
`This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
#' @Param x For class`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18357
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18357
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78404/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18357
**[Test build #78404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78404/testReport)**
for PR 18357 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78409/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371
**[Test build #78409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78409/testReport)**
for PR 18371 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
**[Test build #78411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78411/testReport)**
for PR 18049 at commit
Github user huaxingao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13287#discussion_r123368171
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -594,7 +596,9 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78407/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114
**[Test build #78407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78407/testReport)**
for PR 18114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78410/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
**[Test build #78410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78410/testReport)**
for PR 18355 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049
**[Test build #78411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78411/testReport)**
for PR 18049 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
**[Test build #78410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78410/testReport)**
for PR 18355 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18049#discussion_r123362792
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -272,6 +276,11 @@ def test_explode(self):
self.assertEqual(result[0][0], "a")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78408/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
**[Test build #78408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78408/testReport)**
for PR 18355 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18355
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371
**[Test build #78409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78409/testReport)**
for PR 18371 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18371
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18379
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78402/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
101 - 200 of 536 matches
Mail list logo