Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114#discussion_r123312656
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -34,6 +34,58 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(cbind(model = rownames(mtcars), mtcars))}
NULL
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18114#discussion_r123310929
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2458,111 +2441,78 @@ setMethod("instr", signature(y = "Column", x =
"character"),
column(jc)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78395/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
**[Test build #78395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78395/testReport)**
for PR 18378 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18367
**[Test build #78396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78396/testReport)**
for PR 18367 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18269
Hi @bbossy
> Does it match your scenario?
It does not match my scenario. I'm reading files from HDFS. In your test,
you're reading files from the local filesystem. Can you try a
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
LGTM, pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18367
OK. Updated the doc as suggested. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
**[Test build #78395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78395/testReport)**
for PR 18378 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327#discussion_r123303980
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -739,6 +739,123 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78391/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78391/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
@gatorsmile I remembered @liancheng said `we want to allow users to create
partitioned tables that allow data schema to contain (part of) the partition
columns, and there are test cases for this use
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78389/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18377
**[Test build #78393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78393/testReport)**
for PR 18377 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18354
**[Test build #78394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78394/testReport)**
for PR 18354 at commit
Github user janplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18376
Hi @srowen, @jiangxb1987. Thanks for quick response.
After further debug and consideration, this fix should be done in the
`spark-solr` project. Since this is a Solr specific issue.
I'll
Github user janplus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18376
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18377
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18354
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78392/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
**[Test build #78392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78392/testReport)**
for PR 18378 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
**[Test build #78392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78392/testReport)**
for PR 18378 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
we can update the test after merging
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
cc @ueshin @BryanCutler
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18378
[SPARK-21163][SQL] DataFrame.toPandas should respect the data type
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we convert a spark DataFrame to Pandas Dataframe by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78387/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
**[Test build #78387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78387/testReport)**
for PR 18309 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78386/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
**[Test build #78386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78386/testReport)**
for PR 18309 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78391 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78391/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
[This
fix](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375/files#diff-7a6cb188d2ae31eb3347b5629a679cecR196)
breaks the existing test suites, so I'm looking for other approaches to fix
this issue only...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #78390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78390/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78385/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
**[Test build #78385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78385/testReport)**
for PR 18300 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18377
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user bdrillard commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18354
@dongjoon-hyun I've prepared the PR for the branch-2.2 backport, #18377.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user bdrillard opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18377
[SPARK-18016][SQL][CATALYST][BRANCH-2.2] Code Generation: Constant Pool
Limit - Class Splitting
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a backport patch for Spark
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18162#discussion_r123273222
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -528,7 +528,13 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78388/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78388/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
Github user pralabhkumar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
@MLnick
Thanks for reviewing . I have added comment .
Please review them
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123269246
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -359,38 +365,6 @@ private[ml] trait TreeEnsembleParams extends
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17139
@witgo Are you still working on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18374
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pralabhkumar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
@sethah
Thanks for reviewing the pull request .
- Change the title to obey the proper format [SPARK-20199][ML] ...
- Response : Done
- Change title to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18372
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18374
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14601
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14601
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18367#discussion_r123265927
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ object functions {
def unbase64(e: Column): Column =
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14601
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14601
@agsachin Are you still working on this? And if it is so, would you please
update the description and provide some snapshot to demo the behaviors before &
after the changes? It would also be
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123265283
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -192,6 +196,9 @@ object GBTClassifier extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18372
Merged to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123264432
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -136,6 +136,10 @@ class GBTClassifier @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123264336
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/GradientBoostedTrees.scala
---
@@ -319,8 +327,10 @@ private[spark] object
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123264390
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/GradientBoostedTrees.scala ---
@@ -49,14 +49,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123264302
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/GradientBoostedTrees.scala
---
@@ -284,11 +290,13 @@ private[spark] object
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123264215
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/GradientBoostedTrees.scala
---
@@ -73,19 +75,21 @@ private[spark] object
Github user pralabhkumar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123264263
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/GradientBoostedTrees.scala
---
@@ -284,11 +290,13 @@ private[spark] object
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
these failures definitely look unrelated. I'll kick once more to try to get
clean run.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16456
Should we close this? @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18162
sorry missed that you had commented, yes we can change that
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18162#discussion_r123262316
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -528,7 +528,13 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78384/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
**[Test build #78384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78384/testReport)**
for PR 18118 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
@jiangxb1987 Sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
@viirya Could you please bring this up to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78383/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327#discussion_r123258919
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -739,6 +739,123 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
**[Test build #78383 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78383/testReport)**
for PR 15821 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18376
IMO a port should always be a number, we should not accept the invalid port
format.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123257746
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -359,38 +365,6 @@ private[ml] trait TreeEnsembleParams extends
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r123257669
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -359,38 +365,6 @@ private[ml] trait TreeEnsembleParams extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18376
This isn't a valid fix IMHO and I would close this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
This is ready for review. @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074#discussion_r123254715
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -38,13 +38,15 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{ParentClassLoader,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074#discussion_r123255131
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -38,13 +38,15 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{ParentClassLoader,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78389/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18376
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user janplus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18376
[SPARK-21161][CORE] Make the parseHostPort method tolerate non digital
charactors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the following port parse bug when querying Solr
301 - 400 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
