Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2620#issuecomment-57588061
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57588026
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57588021
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21174/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1486#issuecomment-57588159
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2620#issuecomment-57588338
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21176/consoleFull)
for PR 2620 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1486#issuecomment-57588340
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21177/consoleFull)
for PR 1486 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2391
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1375
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2502
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/476
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1893#issuecomment-57588918
@pwendell can you take a look at this when you have a chance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57589288
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21175/consoleFull)
for PR 789 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57589292
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57589474
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21178/consoleFull)
for PR 2501 at commit
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2126#issuecomment-57589522
@tgravescs This code only apples in mesos mode, so another mode - yarn and
standalone - is not affected.
+1 @timothysc,
val fwInfo =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57589906
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2615#issuecomment-57590286
Hey Patrick, thanks for looking at this. I did not say it is not possible.
I just said the best(easiest ) way I could come up was to modify the maven
install plugin.
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2615#issuecomment-57590353
And this https://github.com/ScrapCodes/scala-install-plugin plugin takes
care of publishing correct poms too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user ScrapCodes reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2357
[SPARK-3437][BUILD] Support crossbuilding in maven. With new
scala-install-plugin.
Since this plugin is not deployed anywhere, for anyone trying this patch
has to publish it locally by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57590494
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57590495
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57590497
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2357#issuecomment-57590659
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21183/consoleFull)
for PR 2357 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2511#issuecomment-57590958
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2511
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2620#issuecomment-57591440
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21176/consoleFull)
for PR 2620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2620#issuecomment-57591446
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-57591816
@pwendell Actually, CRLF is already contained in compute-classpath.cmd so I
think, we should unify CRLF or LF in *.cmd.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624
[SPARK-3762] clear reference of SparkEnv after stop
SparkEnv is cached in ThreadLocal object, so after stop and create a new
SparkContext, old SparkEnv is still used by some threads, it will trigger
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2563#discussion_r18324999
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -205,6 +234,16 @@ def __str__(self):
return ArrayType(%s,%s) % (self.elementType,
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57592234
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57592595
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21184/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57592605
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21185/consoleFull)
for PR 789 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1486#issuecomment-57592627
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21177/consoleFull)
for PR 1486 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57592639
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21178/consoleFull)
for PR 2501 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1486#issuecomment-57592632
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57592643
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1486#issuecomment-57592942
Okay - gonna merge this. Glad it's in good shape now. Thanks @cmccabe for
the contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2513#discussion_r18325314
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -69,23 +78,50 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2625
[SPARK-2461] Add a toString method to GeneralizedLinearModel
Add a toString method to GeneralizedLinearModel, also change `__str__` to
`__repr__` for some classes, to provide better message in repr.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2625#issuecomment-57593293
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21186/consoleFull)
for PR 2625 at commit
Github user sryza closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1388
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1388#issuecomment-57593494
Closing this in favor of #2625
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1486#issuecomment-57593579
w00t!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2625#issuecomment-57593551
Thanks for picking this up @davies. This looks good to me if Jenkins OKs
it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2563#discussion_r18325514
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -205,6 +234,16 @@ def __str__(self):
return ArrayType(%s,%s) % (self.elementType,
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2615#issuecomment-57593822
So now to try this patch just `mvn install - [this
plugin](https://github.com/ScrapCodes/scala-install-plugin). After that look at
the published poms.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57594202
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57594574
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2615#issuecomment-57594573
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ravipesala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#issuecomment-57595734
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623#discussion_r18326718
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1437,7 +1437,13 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2357#issuecomment-57596973
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2357#issuecomment-57596967
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21183/consoleFull)
for PR 2357 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2615#issuecomment-57597447
I think you mean to try `replaceFile` when you said maven-shade-plugin. Let
me try that as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2615#issuecomment-57597737
Ahh wait, I would still need to alter maven-install-plugin. Because, there
has to be someway to tell install plugin that it has to install at location
which has _2.10
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2626
[SPARK-3007][SQL] (This is a debugging PR to test Jenkins build)
**PLEASE DON'T REVIEW/MERGE THIS PR**
Although #2226 passes Jenkins build, Jenkins master SBT build fails
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57598250
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21184/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57598254
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57598297
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21185/consoleFull)
for PR 789 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/789#issuecomment-57598304
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327521
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/ApplicationId.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327526
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -187,6 +187,15 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
val
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327540
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -294,7 +291,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2625#issuecomment-57598745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327640
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1473,7 +1493,10 @@ object SparkContext extends Logging {
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2625#issuecomment-57598737
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21186/consoleFull)
for PR 2625 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327621
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1278,8 +1298,8 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327673
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/MetricsSystem.scala
---
@@ -98,10 +96,23 @@ private[spark] class MetricsSystem private (
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327652
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/DeployMessage.scala
---
@@ -71,11 +72,15 @@ private[deploy] object DeployMessages {
case
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327689
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/MetricsSystem.scala
---
@@ -98,10 +96,23 @@ private[spark] class MetricsSystem private (
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327723
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/MetricsSystem.scala
---
@@ -98,10 +96,23 @@ private[spark] class MetricsSystem private (
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327737
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -43,24 +43,26 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{FileLogger,
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327761
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/local/LocalBackend.scala ---
@@ -115,4 +116,7 @@ private[spark] class LocalBackend(scheduler:
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327771
--- Diff: core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ApplicationIdSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327753
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ private[spark] class
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327744
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerBackend.scala ---
@@ -17,12 +17,16 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18327779
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -48,6 +48,17 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2626#issuecomment-57599241
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57599362
test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57599696
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57599949
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21192/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57600075
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21192/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57600086
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2627
[SPARK-3763] The example of building with sbt should be sbt assembly
instead of sbt compile
In building-spark.md, there are some examples for making assembled package
with maven but the example
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2627#issuecomment-57600468
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21193/consoleFull)
for PR 2627 at commit
GitHub user ericeijkelenboom opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2628
[DEPLOY] SPARK-3759: Return the exit code of the driver process
SparkSubmitDriverBootstrapper.scala now returns the exit code of the driver
process, instead of always returning 0.
You
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2628#issuecomment-57600708
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57601907
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57602181
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21195/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2126#issuecomment-57602773
+1 @tnachen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57602748
test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57603370
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21196/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2626#issuecomment-57603751
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/254/consoleFull)
for PR 2626 at commit
Github user tsudukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-57606210
Generally, using LF as EOL character of *.cmd files may cause some troubles.
For example, when the *.cmd file includes LF and multibyte character, some
characters of
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623#discussion_r18330540
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1437,7 +1437,13 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2627#issuecomment-57607461
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21193/consoleFull)
for PR 2627 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2627#issuecomment-57607465
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57608532
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57608529
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21196/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
1 - 100 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
