Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69510671
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,63 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69510162
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,63 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69509768
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69509714
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69509699
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61744/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
**[Test build #61744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61744/consoleFull)**
for PR 14044 at commit
Github user yanboliang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13218
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13218
Updated PR at #14052 , close this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14052
**[Test build #61745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61745/consoleFull)**
for PR 14052 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14052
[SPARK-15440] [Core] [Deploy] Add CSRF Filter for REST APIs to Spark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
##
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61741/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61742/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61742/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61741/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972
No problem! thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user Sherry302 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14024
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972
LGTM, merging to master. Sorry for leaving this PR for so long...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61743/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61743/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
I just noticed that our nightly docs build has been failing with an error
related to kafka (Example [1]). Will this PR fix this or should we open a new
JIRA for this ?
[1]
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Now, I update the title and description of PR/JIRA.
The only patch in this PR is the following one word change.
```
-new Dataset[Row](sparkSession, logicalPlan,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
**[Test build #61744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61744/consoleFull)**
for PR 14044 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61743/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Hi, @cloud-fan , @hvanhovell , @liancheng .
According to @cloud-fan 's advice, after changing the following, it turns
out that the difference is not noticeable.
```
-new
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61739/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
**[Test build #61739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61739/consoleFull)**
for PR 14051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61740/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61740 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61740/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044#discussion_r69503621
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ private[sql] object Dataset {
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61742/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61738/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
**[Test build #61738 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61738/consoleFull)**
for PR 14039 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69503280
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,70 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61741/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69503069
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,70 @@ case class
Github user bkpathak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12691
Hi @JoshRosen, could you please look at the pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Thank you for review, @liancheng .
I'm sure that the performance of Analyzer need to be improved. But, in any
cases, the cost of analyzer cannot be zero.
We should skip the redundant
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044#discussion_r69502213
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ private[sql] object Dataset {
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
**[Test build #61739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61739/consoleFull)**
for PR 14051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61740/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Agree with @hvanhovell. Analysis should never take so long a time for such
a simple query. We should avoid duplicated analysis work, but fixing
performance issue(s) within the analyzer seems to
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14046#discussion_r69501135
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1258,10 +1258,12 @@ test_that("date functions on a DataFrame", {
df2 <-
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
Shall we also have this in branch-2.0? This seems to be a pretty serious
bug. cc @rxin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
@markhamstra Thanks for the comment. I think the reuse of fragments highly
depends on user's queries, catalyst optimizer, cluster resources... Reusing
`ShuffledRowRDD` shuffle data in a single job
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69499913
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69499892
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69499666
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
@srowen My understanding is that shuffle data in stages are possibly shared
in a job. However, once the job is finished, the current implementation cannot
reuse the shuffle data anymore. So, we can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
**[Test build #61738 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61738/consoleFull)**
for PR 14039 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69498807
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044#discussion_r69498744
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ private[sql] object Dataset {
def ofRows(sparkSession:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044#discussion_r69498260
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ private[sql] object Dataset {
def ofRows(sparkSession:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69498258
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69498156
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,70 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69498130
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,70 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69498054
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
**[Test build #61737 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61737/consoleFull)**
for PR 14051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61737/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61736/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61736 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61736/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
**[Test build #61737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61737/consoleFull)**
for PR 14051 at commit
GitHub user yinxusen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051
[SPARK-16372][MLlib] RowMatrix constructor should use retag for Java
compatibility
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following Java code because of type erasing:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61734/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61734 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61734/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61735/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
**[Test build #61735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61735/consoleFull)**
for PR 14049 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8013
@rxin @mengxr I'm back to US from a leave. Going to revisit PRs under me.
I had worked with @MechCoder to implement Huber estimator in python scikit
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
@sethah Late comment. Great improvement for high dimensional problems. I
didn't test it out myself, and I wonder whether `@transient` annotation works
in the constructor of `LogisticAggregator`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14050
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user aokolnychyi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14050
[MINOR][EXAMPLES] Window function examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
An example that explains the usage of window functions.
It shows the difference
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
**[Test build #61735 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61735/consoleFull)**
for PR 14049 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61736 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61736/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
GitHub user yinxusen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
[SPARK-16369][MLlib] tallSkinnyQR of RowMatrix should aware of empty
partition
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
tallSkinnyQR of RowMatrix should aware of empty
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69494036
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +251,22 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047#discussion_r69493923
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -391,6 +391,29 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047#discussion_r69493896
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -391,6 +391,29 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69493271
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,70 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61734 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61734/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
[SPARK-16370][SQL] Union queries with side effects should be executed
eagerly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, some queries having side effects like
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14031
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
@sethah I apologize for the delay. I just came back to US. Gonna make the
first pass. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13984#discussion_r69492220
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -744,6 +747,9 @@ read.df.default <- function(path = NULL, source = NULL,
schema = NULL, ...) {
if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61733/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
