Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62007/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
**[Test build #62007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62007/consoleFull)**
for PR 14111 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13988
**[Test build #62011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62011/consoleFull)**
for PR 13988 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
**[Test build #62010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62010/consoleFull)**
for PR 14111 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
**[Test build #62009 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62009/consoleFull)**
for PR 14106 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13890
**[Test build #62008 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62008/consoleFull)**
for PR 13890 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
**[Test build #62007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62007/consoleFull)**
for PR 14111 at commit
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
[SPARK-16456][SQL] Reuse the uncorrelated scalar subqueries with the same
logical plan in a query
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14011
@yanboliang is this good to go ? Would be good to merge this soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14078
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14078
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62006/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #62006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62006/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
I double-checked benchmark results, and corrected results in `Write
UnsafeArrayData`. Now, all of them are up to date.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62004/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #62004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62004/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62003/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
**[Test build #62003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62003/consoleFull)**
for PR 14109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62002/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #62002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62002/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #62006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62006/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026
I am going to merge this PR in the interest of RC2. But I would like to
have more tests for testing the conditions that led to the poll+seek to be
added. These subtle behaviors should not go untested.
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026#discussion_r70158520
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -79,8 +81,71 @@ private case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026#discussion_r70158489
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -79,8 +81,71 @@ private case class Subscribe[K,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62001/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
**[Test build #62001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62001/consoleFull)**
for PR 14099 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026#discussion_r70158281
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -79,8 +81,71 @@ private case class Subscribe[K,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62005/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #62005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62005/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Thank you for reviewing :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Thanks @keypointt -- LGTM. Will merge this once Jenkins passes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #62005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62005/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
I just did a quick scan, the no-space style like `session(appName='MyApp',
sparkConfig=list(spark.executor.memory="1g"))` is only found in `example/`
folder (in above commit), and all r files
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70156160
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2045,6 +2047,21 @@ object EliminateUnions extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62000/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14035
Hi @mengxr, is this the change you meant? Could you please take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #62000 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62000/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14110
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user lovexi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14110
[SPARK-16455] Add isClusterAvailableForNewOffers hook to check cluster
availability
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In our case, we are implementing restartable
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70155854
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61999/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
**[Test build #61999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61999/consoleFull)**
for PR 14108 at commit
Github user nmolkeri closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12793
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61998/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
**[Test build #61998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61998/consoleFull)**
for PR 14108 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13993
Any thought? @shivaram what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70154681
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user RussellSpitzer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11317
Updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
ping @dbtsai
I implemented this patch using `@transient` as you suggested. I ran into an
obscure complication using `@transient` with `unapply` method which is not
obvious. While I
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109#discussion_r70153596
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -856,10 +870,10 @@ private class LeastSquaresAggregator(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14107
Oh, super fast! Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14107
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Can you paste a screenshot of the doc?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #62004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62004/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
**[Test build #62003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62003/consoleFull)**
for PR 14109 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14107
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
[SPARK-16404][ML] LeastSquaresAggregators serializes unnecessary data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to `LogisticAggregator`, `LeastSquaresAggregator` used for
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70153229
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14107
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14107
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61996/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #62002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62002/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14107
**[Test build #61996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61996/consoleFull)**
for PR 14107 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
Thanks. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61997/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
looks good except for one comment. thanks for putting this together!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61997/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70151194
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150594
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -143,4 +180,29 @@ private void
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150510
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -93,18 +113,34 @@ protected void
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
**[Test build #62001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62001/consoleFull)**
for PR 14099 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150439
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -79,32 +89,59 @@ protected void
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150418
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -52,6 +59,8 @@
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150424
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -79,32 +89,59 @@ protected void
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150386
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -143,4 +180,29 @@ private void
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70150346
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/ExternalShuffleServiceSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14108
@srowen Does it look good?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #62000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62000/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Thanks @keypointt -- Changes look good to me. @felixcheung any other
comments ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14095
Thank you for merging, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
