Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62043/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62043/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
I just wonder why string should be ignored in the case above. I mean, you
just said "we don't need to handle type-specific null values" and it seems
strings are okay to handle together.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13993#discussion_r70176040
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -53,26 +53,27 @@ setClass("AFTSurvivalRegressionModel",
representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note KMeansModel since
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14121
**[Test build #62042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62042/consoleFull)**
for PR 14121 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14121
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62042/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14011
@shivaram I think it's good to go, I only did user guides sync and reorg.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
FYI, before
[SPARK-14143](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14143), null values
had been handled this way: :
```scala
if (datum == options.nullValue && nullable &&
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14121
**[Test build #62042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62042/consoleFull)**
for PR 14121 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62043 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62043/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14121
[MINOR][ML] update comment where is inconsistent with code in
ml.regression.LinearRegression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `train` method of
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
The diff that github shows is a mess. The actual diff (which is quite
small) is:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62041/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62041/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62040/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62040/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Hi, @rxin .
Now, it's ready for review again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62039/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
**[Test build #62039 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62039/consoleFull)**
for PR 14114 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62041 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62041/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62040/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
No - I just noticed a JIRA that said it was a regression, so I wanted to
make sure you caught this in the RC cycle
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62038/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62038/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
**[Test build #62039 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62039/consoleFull)**
for PR 14114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62037/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
**[Test build #62037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62037/consoleFull)**
for PR 14115 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62038/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62036/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
**[Test build #62036 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62036/consoleFull)**
for PR 14114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62035/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
**[Test build #62035 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62035/consoleFull)**
for PR 14114 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116#discussion_r70173703
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/systemcatalog/InformationSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116#discussion_r70173700
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/systemcatalog/InformationSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62034/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
**[Test build #62034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62034/consoleFull)**
for PR 14115 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11317
**[Test build #3176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3176/consoleFull)**
for PR 11317 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
**[Test build #3174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3174/consoleFull)**
for PR 13969 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #3175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3175/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071#discussion_r70173359
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -45,35 +45,28 @@ case class CatalogFunction(
*/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116#discussion_r7017
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/systemcatalog/InformationSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
**[Test build #62037 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62037/consoleFull)**
for PR 14115 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
Now, `getTableMetadata` is improved.
Thank you for that advice, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70173212
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -146,8 +148,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
**[Test build #62036 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62036/consoleFull)**
for PR 14114 at commit
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119#discussion_r70173180
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaSparkSqlExample.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114
**[Test build #62035 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62035/consoleFull)**
for PR 14114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62032/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
**[Test build #62032 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62032/consoleFull)**
for PR 14115 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70173134
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -146,8 +148,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119#discussion_r70173131
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/SqlDataSourceExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70173113
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -146,8 +148,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119#discussion_r70173058
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -41,43 +35,47 @@ object HiveFromSpark {
//
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119#discussion_r70173035
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1380,17 +949,17 @@ metadata.
{% highlight scala %}
-// spark is an existing
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14112
@jkbradley I find it not easy to add a unit test to cover the logic.
Appreciate your thoughts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70172847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -146,8 +148,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14112
PR created. Sorry I got something else that I need to turn to. Ideally, the
overriding `getAndSetParams` should be in LDAParams, thus it can be reused by
LDA and LDA Local/Distributed Model. Please
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14114#discussion_r70172672
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -442,6 +442,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
**[Test build #62034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62034/consoleFull)**
for PR 14115 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
Now, it preserves the previous behavior for dropping default db, and throws
new exception message for new cases only.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62031/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62031/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62030/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62030/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14120
**[Test build #62033 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62033/consoleFull)**
for PR 14120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14120
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62033/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14120
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70172456
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -146,8 +148,8 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70172359
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1270,21 +1270,28 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70172357
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -146,8 +148,8 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14120
**[Test build #62033 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62033/consoleFull)**
for PR 14120 at commit
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14120
[SPARK-16199][SQL] Add a method to list the referenced columns in data
source Filter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It would be useful to support listing the columns
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13901
@rxin I added tests to this pull request and submitted
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14120
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Sure. I'll update the PR and proceed in this way.
Thank you, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116#discussion_r70172331
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/systemcatalog/InformationSchemaSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115
**[Test build #62032 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62032/consoleFull)**
for PR 14115 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14112
Thanks @GayathriMurali for the PR. I think we'll need to override the
default behavior of getAndSetParams. Meanwhile, we need to invoke both
convertVectorColumnsToML and convertMatrixColumnsToML.
Github user aokolnychyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
@liancheng could you, please, review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090#discussion_r70172206
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -306,6 +306,64 @@ head(ldf, 3)
{% endhighlight %}
+ Run a given function on a large dataset
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14117
Thank you! Could you take a look @davies and @liancheng ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11317
**[Test build #3176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3176/consoleFull)**
for PR 11317 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
**[Test build #3174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3174/consoleFull)**
for PR 13969 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #3175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3175/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
GitHub user aokolnychyi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
[SPARK-16303][DOCS][EXAMPLES][WIP] Updated SQL programming guide and
examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Hard-coded Spark SQL sample snippets were moved
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
This looks pretty good. Can you add more comments explaining what each
class/method does, and how the whole thing works?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116#discussion_r70172130
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/systemcatalog/InformationSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
