Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421#discussion_r82940884
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/SerDe.scala ---
@@ -125,15 +125,34 @@ private[spark] object SerDe {
}
def
Github user apivovarov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15447
Related PRs
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15396
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12576
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15447
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66792/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user apivovarov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15447
[SPARK-14804][Graphx] Graph vertexRDD/EdgeRDD checkpoint results Clasâ¦
EdgeRDD/VertexRDD wraps partitionsRDD
e.g. `EdgeRDDImpl.checkpoint()` calls `partitionsRDD.checkpoint()`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66789/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
**[Test build #66792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66792/consoleFull)**
for PR 15375 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
**[Test build #66789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66789/consoleFull)**
for PR 15445 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66794/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66794/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66794/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15230#discussion_r82940270
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -225,6 +225,11 @@ case class AlterTableSetPropertiesCommand(
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
@zsxwing Why was not this merge to 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66790/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
**[Test build #66790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66790/consoleFull)**
for PR 15427 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15439
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15440
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15440
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434#discussion_r82938529
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -459,11 +459,20 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r82938410
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434
Just FYI. Hive allows the following changes:
```SQL
ALTER TABLE db1.tbl RENAME TO db2.tbl2
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15406
We should add weights to the doctests to demonstrate them and make sure
they're working.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r82937473
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
@marmbrus Could you take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610
This problem should be handled by
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394 if it is merged. It seems this is no
longer active, and we are pursuing alternative solutions. Shall we close this?
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r82937255
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008
@rotationsymmetry Could you please close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
@falaki @felixcheung The DirectKafkaStreamSuite is a known flaky test.
Nothing in this patch should affect Kafka.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82931901
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/PredictorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82932068
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/Predictor.scala ---
@@ -121,10 +122,18 @@ abstract class Predictor[
* and put it in an RDD with
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82935295
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/PredictorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82932894
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/PredictorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82932799
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66786/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #66786 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66786/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66784/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66785/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66784 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66784/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #66785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66785/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
@shivaram yes I just noticed it during my debugging and fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15335#discussion_r82933318
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1255,27 +1255,46 @@ class DAGScheduler(
s"longer
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422#discussion_r82932947
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -588,6 +588,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.doubleConf
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422#discussion_r82933077
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -170,4 +170,9 @@ package object config {
.doc("Port to use for
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422#discussion_r82932992
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/NewHadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -179,7 +183,16 @@ class NewHadoopRDD[K, V](
override def
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422#discussion_r82932645
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -253,8 +256,12 @@ class HadoopRDD[K, V](
try {
finished
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15444
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66787/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15444
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15444
**[Test build #66787 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66787/consoleFull)**
for PR 15444 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66793/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66793/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66793/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15443
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66782/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15443
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15443
**[Test build #66782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66782/consoleFull)**
for PR 15443 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
**[Test build #66792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66792/consoleFull)**
for PR 15375 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15398#discussion_r82931395
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/StringUtils.scala
---
@@ -25,26 +25,25 @@ object StringUtils {
//
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
cc @falaki Is this also a part of #15375 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
Thanks @jrshust for the PR.
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15335#discussion_r82931294
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1255,27 +1255,46 @@ class DAGScheduler(
s"longer
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66791/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66791 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66791/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
**[Test build #66790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66790/consoleFull)**
for PR 15427 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66791/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
Merging to master! Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
**[Test build #66789 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66789/consoleFull)**
for PR 15445 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user jrshust opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
[SPARK-17882][SPARKR] Fix swallowed exception in RBackendHandler
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Log exception that is swallowed in handleMethodCall. This allows
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389#discussion_r82930615
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2029,7 +2028,15 @@ def coalesce(self, numPartitions, shuffle=False):
>>> sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
[SPARK-17817][PySpark][FOLLOWUP] PySpark RDD Repartitioning Results in
Highly Skewed Partition Sizes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change is a followup for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66788/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #66788 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66788/consoleFull)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #66788 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66788/consoleFull)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15444
**[Test build #66787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66787/consoleFull)**
for PR 15444 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389#discussion_r82929167
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2029,7 +2028,15 @@ def coalesce(self, numPartitions, shuffle=False):
>>> sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15431
@jkbradley I agree it's not necessary to get in branch-2.0, since it
requires a new public API. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66778/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434
**[Test build #66778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66778/consoleFull)**
for PR 15434 at commit
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14847
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14847
@rxin Thanks for recommendation! Let me close it now and work on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66777/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
**[Test build #66777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66777/consoleFull)**
for PR 15295 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #66786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66786/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15444
**[Test build #66783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66783/consoleFull)**
for PR 15444 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15444
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66783/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 661 matches
Mail list logo
