Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70069/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
**[Test build #70069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70069/consoleFull)**
for PR 16264 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70070/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
**[Test build #70070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70070/consoleFull)**
for PR 16264 at commit
Github user vijoshi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
@holdenk reminder
also pinging @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16161
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70068/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
**[Test build #70068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70068/consoleFull)**
for PR 16264 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264#discussion_r92112001
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ In the following example, we use the `longley` dataset
to train a random forest
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
and if we are doing "(Added in Spark 2.1.0)" in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16222/files perhaps we should have the
same for these 2?
actually, I'd vote for removing them -
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
**[Test build #70071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70071/consoleFull)**
for PR 16263 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16259
LGTM. Let's trigger appveyor again like Hyukjin says
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16259#discussion_r92111051
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1595,14 +1595,14 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"ALSModel", path = "character"),
#' \dontrun{
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
LGTM. maybe good to have one example for classification but optional
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247
Possibly, SPARK-16027 was just a hack, the root issue remains I think
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
The current fix does not resolve the issue when users hitting abnormal
termination of JVM. In addition, if the JVM does not stop, these temporary
files could consume a lot of spaces. Thus, I
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16259
(@wangmiao1981 you could close and re-open this to re-trigger the build as
we already talk before if you or any cares).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
**[Test build #70070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70070/consoleFull)**
for PR 16264 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
**[Test build #70069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70069/consoleFull)**
for PR 16264 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16262
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
**[Test build #70068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70068/consoleFull)**
for PR 16264 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r92108007
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,93 @@ case class
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16264
SPARK-18792] [R] add spark.randomForest to vignettes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Mention `spark.randomForest` in vignettes. Keep the content minimal since
users can
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247
This test failure seems related with this PR. It seems because the previous
Hive-enabled spark session is not closed properly between `test_saprkSQL.R` and
`test_sparkR.R` here, in particular,
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247
re: test failure. it might be related to this change? the call stack is
hidden, it should be trying to call into
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16222
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #70067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70067/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16222
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.1. I will change the `regParam` value
in a follow-up PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16149
@srowen @sethah
One more commit that adds a test case with `weight = 4.7` which will round
up to 5 to test the case @sethah described. All tests passed. I'm pretty sure
R's rounding is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #70066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70066/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16220
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
**[Test build #70065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70065/consoleFull)**
for PR 15915 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717
**[Test build #70064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70064/consoleFull)**
for PR 15717 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915#discussion_r92104532
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBufferOutputStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -119,4 +119,21 @@ class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92081435
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -157,8 +160,16 @@ abstract class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92079858
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,322 @@
package
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92076411
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,275 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92079426
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,322 @@
package
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r90543377
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,275 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92078434
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -584,6 +614,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92079769
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,322 @@
package
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92103779
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -121,13 +121,20 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r90543538
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,254 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92103550
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -217,18 +219,35 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
*
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92081806
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -408,6 +411,96 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92103358
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1339,6 +1347,28 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92077755
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorFailuresInTaskSet.scala
---
@@ -25,26 +25,30 @@ import
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92081374
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -157,8 +160,16 @@ abstract class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r90543965
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,275 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92075850
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,275 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r90147862
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,272 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92103809
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -121,13 +121,20 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92078684
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -678,4 +716,13 @@ private[spark] object TaskSchedulerImpl {
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92103410
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -691,11 +691,11 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92076298
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,275 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92079984
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,10 +17,322 @@
package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16258
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70058/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16258
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247
a new property for default warehouse LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16258
**[Test build #70058 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70058/consoleFull)**
for PR 16258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
**[Test build #70063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70063/consoleFull)**
for PR 15915 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915#discussion_r92103662
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBufferOutputStream.scala
---
@@ -30,9 +31,14 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70062/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
**[Test build #70062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70062/consoleFull)**
for PR 16263 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16262
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #70059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70059/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70059/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16262
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70056/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
**[Test build #70062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70062/consoleFull)**
for PR 16263 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16262
**[Test build #70056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70056/consoleFull)**
for PR 16262 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
[SPARK-18281][SQL][PySpark] Consumes the returned local iterator
immediately to prevent timeout on the socket serving the data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r92102030
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/change-column.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+-- Create the origin table
+CREATE TABLE
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r92101718
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,80 @@ case class AlterTableUnsetPropertiesCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r92101553
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,80 @@ case class AlterTableUnsetPropertiesCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r92101519
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,80 @@ case class AlterTableUnsetPropertiesCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
**[Test build #70061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70061/consoleFull)**
for PR 15996 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
**[Test build #70060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70060/consoleFull)**
for PR 15995 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #70059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70059/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
@vanzin I have removed related changes in `EventLoggingListener`, and
provide a new clean mode, i.e. `space` based mode. Please take a review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r92100070
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,80 @@ case class AlterTableUnsetPropertiesCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995#discussion_r92099484
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -128,61 +128,69 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995#discussion_r92099139
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -128,61 +128,69 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70055/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
**[Test build #70055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70055/consoleFull)**
for PR 16252 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16194
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16194
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70057/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16194
**[Test build #70057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70057/consoleFull)**
for PR 16194 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70054/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #70054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70054/consoleFull)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16258
**[Test build #70058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70058/consoleFull)**
for PR 16258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16194
**[Test build #70057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70057/consoleFull)**
for PR 16194 at commit
1 - 100 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
