Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
[SPARK-16929] Improve performance when check speculatable tasks.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When check speculatable tasks in `TaskSetManager`, current code scan
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16809
I just found refresh table related to table insertion when
`DataFrameWriter.saveAsTable` with overwrite mode, and `InsetIntoHiveTable`.
`InsertHadoopFsRelation` need to refresh table?
---
If
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
@liancheng FYI
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #3570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3570/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
**[Test build #72634 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72634/testReport)**
for PR 16776 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
**[Test build #72633 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72633/testReport)**
for PR 16866 at commit
Github user watermen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
@viirya We'd better don't modify the API and in `TaskMetrics` already has
`resultSize`, we can add `resultNum` like it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72630/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72630 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72630/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
[SPARK-19529] TransportClientFactory.createClient() shouldn't call
awaitUninterruptibly()
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch replaces a single
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865#discussion_r100245982
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1004,7 +1016,8 @@ object CodeGenerator
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
**[Test build #72632 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72632/testReport)**
for PR 16865 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
[SPARK-19530][SQL] Use guava weigher for code cache eviction
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We use guava cache to cache compiled codes for codegen. Currently we use
Github user vitillo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
@zsxwing Since I can't access the build results you could please tell me
why the patch fails to build?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
Could somebody help review this PR? I think this will make gathering the
estimation results in Scala much easier. This will also be helpful in
constructing the tests. For example, the GLM
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72625/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785
**[Test build #72625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72625/testReport)**
for PR 16785 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72626/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750
**[Test build #72626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72626/testReport)**
for PR 16750 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100241493
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -776,20 +778,21 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72631 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72631/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
thanks! @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72627/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72627 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72627/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
OK. I'll try it immediately. Thank U very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100238713
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72623/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16809
where do we refresh table for table insertion? will we fresh twice(table
and path)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #72623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72623/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
ping @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
You might be able to make it by forcefully pushing the new changes by `git
push -f origin NEW_BRANCH:REMOTE_BRANCH `
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72630/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
No worry, open/submit a new PR. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Late in the east coast. Will review it tomorrow. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
Oh, I See, I miss a step âgit remote add upstream ...â.
But now, I have delete my repository in my profile. So this PR canât know
which repository should be associated. So, do u
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72628/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72628/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
You do not need to do the step 1 every time. You might miss the following
two steps when you want to resolve your conflicts.
> git fetch upstream
> git merge upstream/master
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100236493
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
Here's how I create a PR:
1.fork the master of Apache;
2.create a new branch in my master branch
3.select my new branch menu and create a new PR.
4.edit my new branch code.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100236345
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100235734
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -815,7 +819,20 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100235680
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -776,20 +778,21 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
You might not be familiar with the Github/Git. How about submitting a new
PR? : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user tdas closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
My master branch with the master of Apache is not synchronized, and then I
did the pull operation, my master branch still not synchronized, and finally I
removed my remote repository.
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan thank you for the time and efforts you've put in
reviewing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100235360
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
At least, `spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.6` goes green.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
LGTM
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
Your master is clean (i.e., exactly identical to the upstream/master),
right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
@dongjoon-hyun @srowen could you help to review this? thanks very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
ping @mengxr @jkbradley @liancheng @MLnick May you take a look at this?
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72629 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72629/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Many thanks @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
if we not set ivy.jars.repos , it will use default ${user.home}/.m2 repo,
and if we set ivy.jars.path which has download, it will can alos load from this
path.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785
since this change is related to SQL, cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785
I don't find a way to improve `getAliasedConstraints` significantly by
re-writing its logic. The current way to improve its performance is using
parallel collection to do the transformation in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72628 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72628/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578#discussion_r100232773
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/GetStructField2.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72616/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72616/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100232628
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
@watermen Thanks for the review. What is the advantage of adding it in
`TaskMetrics` instead of `MapStatus`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72627 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72627/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72620/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #72620 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72620/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100231056
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72619/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72619 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72619/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72621/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
**[Test build #72621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72621/testReport)**
for PR 16760 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100229660
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578#discussion_r100229358
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/GetStructField2.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854#discussion_r100229312
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -361,6 +362,41 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578#discussion_r100229300
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/SelectedField.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750
**[Test build #72626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72626/testReport)**
for PR 16750 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785
**[Test build #72625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72625/testReport)**
for PR 16785 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72624/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72622/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
