Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
**[Test build #73921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73921/testReport)**
for PR 16762 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161
Firstly, I see this as slightly different from Python, in that in R it is
common to have built-in datasets and possibly users are used to having them and
having examples using them.
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161#discussion_r104306085
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -741,12 +724,12 @@ setMethod("coalesce",
#' @examples
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
-#' path
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161#discussion_r104306095
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -548,10 +537,9 @@ setMethod("registerTempTable",
#' @examples
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161#discussion_r104306091
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -741,12 +724,12 @@ setMethod("coalesce",
#' @examples
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
-#' path
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161#discussion_r104306047
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2805,10 +2779,9 @@ setMethod("except",
#' @examples
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
-#' path <-
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161#discussion_r104306070
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1123,10 +1096,9 @@ setMethod("dim",
#' @examples
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
-#' path <-
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
What is the rationale for this change ? Is it to propagate the task kill
reason to UI ?
The one line in
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17145
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73920/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
**[Test build #73920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73920/testReport)**
for PR 17167 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17145
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17145
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17145
**[Test build #73919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73919/testReport)**
for PR 17145 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16656
ping @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
**[Test build #73920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73920/testReport)**
for PR 17167 at commit
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17167
[SPARK-19822][TEST] CheckpointSuite.testCheckpointedOperation: should not
check checkpointFilesOfLatestTime by the PATH string.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73918/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134
**[Test build #73918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73918/testReport)**
for PR 17134 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17159
hmm... this is somewhat by design - `union` could take in 2 DataFrames that
might not match in column names or type. In that case values in one of the
DataFrame will be coerced to make things
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17145
**[Test build #73919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73919/testReport)**
for PR 17145 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17144
@kayousterhout sure, I was being doing that flaky test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17145#discussion_r104304108
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -312,13 +312,23 @@ object QueryTest {
sparkAnswer: Seq[Row],
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134
**[Test build #73918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73918/testReport)**
for PR 17134 at commit
Github user crackcell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
@imatiach-msft @cloud-fan I updated the code, replaced java.lang.Double
with isNullAt() and getDouble().
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73915/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73915/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73917/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73917/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user tanejagagan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17035
@hvanhovell
Can you help me with this pull request
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73917/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73916/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73916/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73916/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17136#discussion_r104301364
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ test_that("read/write csv as DataFrame", {
mockLinesCsv <-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17094
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17094
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73914/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17094
**[Test build #73914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73914/testReport)**
for PR 17094 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73915/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r104301109
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +109,26 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541
Also please note the [UnsafeArrayData-producing
branch](https://github.com/michalsenkyr/spark/compare/dataset-seq-builder...michalsenkyr:dataset-seq-builder-unsafe)
that is not yet merged into
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541
Would it be possible for somebody to review this PR for me? I have a few
ideas that are dependent on this and I'd like to get to work on them. Most
notably support for Java Lists.
Maybe
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16842
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
**[Test build #73911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73911/testReport)**
for PR 16933 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73913/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73913/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17094
**[Test build #73914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73914/testReport)**
for PR 17094 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17094
Jenkins test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16998
@hvanhovell Do you have any thoughts on this already? Please let me know.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73913/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17163
If Avro is good at backwards compatibility it shouldn't be an issue;
@JoshRosen seems to maintain the spark-avro package so he might have more
insights.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73912/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73912/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
**[Test build #73910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73910/testReport)**
for PR 16933 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #73912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73912/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
[SPARK-19820] [core] Allow reason to be specified for task kill
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This refactors the task kill path to allow specifying a reason for the
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164
@maropu I think this is pretty exciting. This is very useful in situations
where we have a lot of groups, in that case I will happily take a 2x
performance improvement any day. This is still
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
**[Test build #73911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73911/testReport)**
for PR 16933 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
**[Test build #73910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73910/testReport)**
for PR 16933 at commit
Github user yongtang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12461
/cc @daniloascione please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17165
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296156
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -142,18 +166,18 @@ class StringIndexerModel (
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296099
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -105,7 +125,11 @@ class StringIndexer @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296562
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -163,25 +187,28 @@ class StringIndexerModel (
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296367
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -163,25 +190,28 @@ class StringIndexerModel (
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296546
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -71,18 +92,17 @@ class StringIndexer @Since("1.4.0") (
def
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296045
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -34,8 +36,27 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.collection.OpenHashMap
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296396
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -163,25 +190,28 @@ class StringIndexerModel (
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296526
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -542,12 +543,13 @@ column, we should get the following:
"a" gets index `0` because it is the most frequent,
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883#discussion_r104296075
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -105,7 +125,11 @@ class StringIndexer @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17165
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17165
**[Test build #73909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73909/testReport)**
for PR 17165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17165
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73909/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17161
I think most examples in R packages are (supposed to be) runnable. Coming
from a user perspective, I find it useful if I can run the examples directly
and see what the function does in action.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17165
**[Test build #73909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73909/testReport)**
for PR 17165 at commit
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17165
[DO NOT MERGE][TESTING] Vince shieh spark 17498
Temp PR to reproduce Jenkins compilation error
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
Based on the comment @marmbrus in a JIRA, we prefer to using our DDL
format. For example, like what we did for CREATE TABLE, we can specify the
schema using `a int, b string`
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17163
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17163
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73906/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17163
**[Test build #73906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73906/testReport)**
for PR 17163 at commit
Github user Sazpaimon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
@gatorsmile Alternatively, one can use do what brickhouse's `from_json`
Hive UDF does ( https://gist.github.com/jeromebanks/8855408#file-gistfile1-sql )
(For the record, I actually need
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73908/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164
**[Test build #73908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73908/testReport)**
for PR 17164 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16611
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73905/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16611
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16611
**[Test build #73905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73905/testReport)**
for PR 16611 at commit
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
