Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Also cc @cloud-fan who is the original PR author who implemented bucketBy.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
@zero323 Could you also update the [SQL
document](http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sql-programming-guide.html)?
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r115134650
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -563,6 +563,60 @@ def partitionBy(self, *cols):
self._jwrite =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17882
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76533/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17882
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17882
**[Test build #76533 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76533/testReport)**
for PR 17882 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #76541 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76541/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Could you please check the documents we did in Scala APIs? It sounds like
we forgot to update the Python function descriptions when we did the change in
the Scala APIs.
---
If your project is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865#discussion_r115134581
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -409,7 +432,7 @@ def isnan(col):
@since(1.6)
def isnull(col):
-"""An expression
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17831
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17831
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17887
**[Test build #76540 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76540/testReport)**
for PR 17887 at commit
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17887
cc @dbtsai @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17887
[SPARK-20399][SQL][WIP] Add a config to fallback string literal parsing
consistent with old sql parser behavior
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow the discussion in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76539/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
**[Test build #76539 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76539/testReport)**
for PR 17886 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
**[Test build #76539 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76539/testReport)**
for PR 17886 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17878
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17878
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76532/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17878
**[Test build #76532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76532/testReport)**
for PR 17878 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17881
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76531/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76537/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17881
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
**[Test build #76537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76537/testReport)**
for PR 17886 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17881
**[Test build #76531 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76531/testReport)**
for PR 17881 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #76536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76536/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76536/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user wangyum closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15466
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17874
**[Test build #76538 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76538/testReport)**
for PR 17874 at commit
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17880
@gatorsmile thanks,l will do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
**[Test build #76537 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76537/testReport)**
for PR 17886 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17874
@cloud-fan This rule could make the query work:
Seq(1).toDF("c1").createOrReplaceTempView("onerow")
sql(
"""
| select 1
|from (select 1
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17886
[SPARK-13983][SQL][WIP] Fix HiveThriftServer2 can not get "--hiveconf" and
''--hivevar" variables since 2.x
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix HiveThriftServer2 can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76534/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
**[Test build #76534 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76534/testReport)**
for PR 17884 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r115133626
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -563,6 +563,60 @@ def partitionBy(self, *cols):
self._jwrite =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #76536 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76536/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17885
**[Test build #76535 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76535/testReport)**
for PR 17885 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17885
I'll target this for master, branch-2.2, branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17885
[SPARK-20627][PYSPARK] Drop the hadoop distirbution name from the Python
version
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Drop the hadoop distirbution name from the Python
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
**[Test build #76534 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76534/testReport)**
for PR 17884 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
@felixcheung I ran a quick QA on the vignettes and fixed some additional
typos and styles.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r115133315
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -22,9 +22,13 @@ import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697
I left some comments here though, I think I am not confident enough for a
sign-off. Please let me defer to @srowen and @tejasapatil
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r115133197
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -22,9 +22,13 @@ import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r115133107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +53,7 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctions[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r115133103
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctions[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r115133174
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctions[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17882
**[Test build #76533 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76533/testReport)**
for PR 17882 at commit
Github user debasish83 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
@hhbyyh can we smooth the hinge-loss using soft-max (variant of ReLU) and
then use LBFGS ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user yangyangyyy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697
@HyukjinKwon @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17831
This change LGTM.
I go to check #17848. It seems to me that the PR simply adds two flags into
ScalaUDF. It appears that there is not API change regarding with existing UDF
registration. I
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801#discussion_r115132676
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2657,22 +2661,27 @@ object functions {
/**
*
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17878
Thanks, @HyukjinKwon AppVeyor looks good, waiting for Jenkins again
(although, it has nothing to do with it..)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17878
**[Test build #76532 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76532/testReport)**
for PR 17878 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17881
**[Test build #76531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76531/testReport)**
for PR 17881 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17878
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17881
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
@actuaryzhang thanks - would you have a chance to run a quick QA check on
the rest of the vignettes, if you haven't already?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
This test seems flaky on AppVeyor, not sure why
```
Failed
-
1. Error: spark.glm and predict
Github user mariahualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17854
Now I can comfortably use 2500 executors. But when I pushed the executor
count to 3000, I saw a lot of heartbeat timeout errors. It is something else we
can improve, probably another jira.
Github user mariahualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17854
I re-ran the same application adding these configurations "--conf
spark.yarn.scheduler.heartbeat.interval-ms=15000 --conf
spark.yarn.launchContainer.count.simultaneously=50". Though it took 50
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76530/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #76530 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76530/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
Github user mariahualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17854
Let me describe what I've seen when using 2500 executors.
1. In the first a few (2~3) requests, AM received all (in this case 2500)
containers from Yarn.
2. In a few seconds, 2500
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76529/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
**[Test build #76529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76529/testReport)**
for PR 17644 at commit
Github user mariahualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17854
@squito yes, I capped the number of resources in updateResourceRequests so
that YarnAllocator asks for less number of resources in each iteration. When
allocation fails one iteration, the
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
@HyukjinKwon Thanks for pointing this out. I will keep this in mind next
time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76528/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
**[Test build #76528 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76528/testReport)**
for PR 17801 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #76530 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76530/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Great, let me know if there is any questions @keypointt :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17831
@gatorsmile want to know if you're ok with this going into master or if you
still have concerns about this if its targeted to 2.3?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r115129876
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -563,6 +563,60 @@ def partitionBy(self, *cols):
self._jwrite =
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r115129682
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -563,6 +563,60 @@ def partitionBy(self, *cols):
self._jwrite =
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r115129884
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -563,6 +563,60 @@ def partitionBy(self, *cols):
self._jwrite =
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17849#discussion_r115129786
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -1355,7 +1370,7 @@ def test_java_params(self):
for name, cls in inspect.getmembers(module,
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17849#discussion_r115129846
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py ---
@@ -263,7 +282,14 @@ def _fit_java(self, dataset):
def _fit(self, dataset):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
**[Test build #76529 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76529/testReport)**
for PR 17644 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
@MLnick @jkbradley @sethah Could you take a review? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17092
@MLnick @jkbradley @sethah Could you take a review? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801#discussion_r115128695
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2647,7 +2647,11 @@ object functions {
}
/**
- *
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801#discussion_r115128766
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2657,22 +2661,27 @@ object functions {
/**
*
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17884
I know it is legitimate but It would be worth double checking other typos
too. Usually, single typo PR is not encouraged up to my knowledge given
reviwing, building and merging costs.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76526/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
**[Test build #76526 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76526/testReport)**
for PR 17835 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
**[Test build #76528 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76528/testReport)**
for PR 17801 at commit
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
