Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696
Don't block on me. Just wanted to doubly sure if this is the only way. I am
fine.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #92554 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92554/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696
Yea, I got that we it should have been done like this, and wonder if we can
avoid this. It sounds more like a bandaid fix mainly cased by decimal. FWIW, in
case of timestamp as INT96
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696
you can't get the physical schema information in a higher layer, as it may
vary for different files. The table schema can evolve(add/drop column).
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696
physical schema information shouldn't usually referred in a higher layer
though cc @liancheng. It's kind of something we should avoid .. I got that we
need this but wonder if this is the only
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199686314
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -379,14 +366,29 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92551/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21668#discussion_r199682495
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -375,16 +375,16 @@ case class CatalogStatistics(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
**[Test build #92551 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92551/testReport)**
for PR 21469 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
**[Test build #92553 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92553/testReport)**
for PR 21701 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/631/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
[SPARK-24730][SS] Add policy to choose max as global watermark when
streaming query has multiple watermarks
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when a streaming
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21605
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21605
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21668
yea, ok. I'll reconsider this again. Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696
makes sense to me, since we need the physical schema information to
pushdown decimal and timestamp. also cc @rdblue @michal-databricks
---
Github user bersprockets commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21073#discussion_r199678852
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -551,6 +551,36 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199678338
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -379,14 +366,29 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21668
yea this is a real problem, but I feel a better solution is to integrate
the StarSchemaDetection into CBO. How hard will it be?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92550/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92550 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92550/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199672805
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -19,166 +19,186 @@ package
Github user yuanboliu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21690
The first pause is used to stop poll() in the method paranoidPoll
The second one is attached because of p.partition().
I'm not sure whether the state of pause will be rewritten after these
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21618
gental ping @cloud-fan @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21633
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/630/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21633
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21633
**[Test build #92552 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92552/testReport)**
for PR 21633 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92543/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21546
**[Test build #92543 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92543/testReport)**
for PR 21546 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92540/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
**[Test build #92540 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92540/testReport)**
for PR 21459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21601
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92545/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21601
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21601
**[Test build #92545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92545/testReport)**
for PR 21601 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
**[Test build #92551 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92551/testReport)**
for PR 21469 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92544/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
**[Test build #92544 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92544/testReport)**
for PR 21469 at commit
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
retest this, please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92542/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
**[Test build #92542 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92542/testReport)**
for PR 21469 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21692
Thanks @srowen for explanation. As I can tell, `-verbose:class` shows jline
classes come from `jline-2.12.jar`, though `sbt dependency-tree` shows
`jline:jline:0.9.94`. After this overriding, jline
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Thanks. Awesome. This matches what I had in mind then.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92541/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
**[Test build #92541 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92541/testReport)**
for PR 21699 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21692
Thank you all!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92537/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #92537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92537/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
SGTM.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:38 PM DB Tsai wrote:
> There are three approvals from the committers, and the changes are pretty
> trivial to revert if we see any performance
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21662
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21662
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92536/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21662
**[Test build #92536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92536/testReport)**
for PR 21662 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92550 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92550/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92549/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92549 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92549/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92549 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92549/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
There are three approvals from the committers, and the changes are pretty
trivial to revert if we see any performance regression which is unlikely. To
move thing forward, if there is no further
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92548 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92548/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199648692
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRowConverter.scala
---
@@ -182,18 +182,20 @@ private[parquet]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92548/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92548 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92548/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Missing new line in EOF for two new Java files. Just addressed.
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696
cc @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
**[Test build #4202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4202/testReport)**
for PR 21459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92547/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92547 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92547/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199643803
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -71,9 +80,22 @@ private[parquet]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92547 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92547/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
cc. @tdas @zsxwing @jose-torres @jerryshao @arunmahadevan @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
retest this, please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92546/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92546/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92546/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Pasting JIRA issue description to explain why this patch is needed:
As default version of "spark.sql.streaming.minBatchesToRetain" is set to
high (100), which doesn't require strictly
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
SPARK-24717 Split out min retain version of state for memory in
HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes breaking down
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21692
I haven't looked into this particular issue thoroughly, but, I'm aware that
SBT and Maven don't actually resolve dependencies in quite the same way. I
think the resolve conflicts with different
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92535/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
**[Test build #92535 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92535/testReport)**
for PR 21687 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21605
kindly ping @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21599#discussion_r199632638
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -128,17 +128,31 @@ abstract class
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199631341
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -47,16 +47,25 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21601
**[Test build #92545 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92545/testReport)**
for PR 21601 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/629/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
**[Test build #92544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92544/testReport)**
for PR 21469 at commit
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
