Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
please see https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
open a JIRA and update this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user vgankidi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
I agree with @ash211. Applications shouldn't rely on the order of the files
within a partition.
This optimization looks good to me.
---
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Tagging folks who have touched this code recently: @vgankidi @ericl @davies
This seems to provide a more compact packing in every scenario, which
should improve execution times. One risk
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86591/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
**[Test build #86591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86591/testReport)**
for PR 20372 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
**[Test build #86591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86591/testReport)**
for PR 20372 at commit
Github user glentakahashi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
The large non-splittable files is already tested by
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Please fix the scala style checks --
```
Running Scala style checks
Scalastyle checks failed at following
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
**[Test build #86567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86567/testReport)**
for PR 20372 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86567/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
**[Test build #86567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86567/testReport)**
for PR 20372 at commit
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Jenkins, this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20372
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
16 matches
Mail list logo
