[GitHub] spark pull request #23216: [SPARK-26264][CORE]It is better to add @transient...

2018-12-04 Thread 10110346
Github user 10110346 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23216 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark pull request #23216: [SPARK-26264][CORE]It is better to add @transient...

2018-12-04 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23216#discussion_r238892679 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala --- @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](

[GitHub] spark pull request #23216: [SPARK-26264][CORE]It is better to add @transient...

2018-12-04 Thread 10110346
GitHub user 10110346 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23216 [SPARK-26264][CORE]It is better to add @transient to field 'locs' for class `ResultTask`. ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? The field 'locs' is only used in driver side for