One might argue that `DistTag` probably should be used. But I will leave this
to @pmatilai and @ffesti
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
replaced tab with spaces
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/590#issuecomment-435516427___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Currently as far as I can see in many cases ghost files are not marked fully in
spec files. Problem is when ghost file does not exist but is defined at spec
file.
If you run rpm --restore you can change many files to perms like d-. or
--. or make files where there should be
woops, repushed...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/590#issuecomment-435489018___
Rpm-maint mailing list
ignatenkobrain requested changes on this pull request.
actually it doesn't look good to me, please change tab to spaces ;)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
ignatenkobrain approved this pull request.
lgtm
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
In ALT there can be different builds of the same NEVR which only
differ in disttag, so it is useful to print its value as part of
package information.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
It is a very good point.
Empty capabilities ('') and no capabilities are different. Because (from
SETCAP(8) man page):
"setting an empty capability set is not the same as removing it. An empty set
can be used to guarantee a file is not executed with privilege inspite of the
fact that the
