Please just license those two files as GPLv2+. There is not point in having
those scripts as LGPL. It's not like anyone is going to link to them.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #471.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/471#event-2992582824___
Rpm-maint mailing list
LGPLv2.1(+) or GPLv2(+) is fine with me.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/471#issuecomment-485118161___
I would like to have it licensed as the rest of RPM stuff (IIRC GPLv2+), but
I'm fine with whatever @ffesti or @pmatilai come up.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@Conan-Kudo @ignatenkobrain @soig @scop @proyvind ?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hi, we have three files in Fedora's python-rpm-generators:
*
[python.attr](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/master/f/python.attr)
*
[pythondeps.sh](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/master/f/pythondeps.sh)
*
