Re: Why try to update (some) permissions which are the same?

Am 06.09.23 um 08:49 schrieb Paul Slootman via rsync: The current version is 3.2.7, especially 2.6.8 is quite ancient. You may want to upgrade before going bug hunting, chances are your problem has already been fixed. Oh yes, exactly the step to 3.* did a lot both to option and PERFORMANCE!

Re: Why try to update (some) permissions which are the same?

On Sun 03 Sep 2023, Perry Hutchison via rsync wrote: > On the source system: > > $ rsync --version > rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 > On the destination system: > $ rsync --version > rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 The current version is 3.2.7, especially 2.6.8 is quite

Re: Why try to update (some) permissions which are the same?

Kevin Korb wrote: > On Sun, 3 Sep 2023, Perry Hutchison via rsync wrote: > > On the source system: > > ... > > $ ll -d fcst-200[89] fcst-201[01] > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 perryh perryh 7168 Nov 27 2009 fcst-2008 > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 perryh perryh 9216 Jul 21 2010 fcst-2009 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 perryh

Re: Why try to update (some) permissions which are the same?

, 3 Sep 2023, Perry Hutchison via rsync wrote: Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 00:35:29 -0700 From: Perry Hutchison via rsync To: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Why try to update (some) permissions which are the same? On the source system: $ rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29

Why try to update (some) permissions which are the same?

On the source system: $ rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, ACLs, symlinks, batchfiles, inplace, IPv6, file