Re: Apparent synchronization bug in rsync

2022-12-09 Thread Kevin Korb via rsync
The included github test case failed for me on vanilla rsync-3.2.7... % ./test.sh new.bin test.bin differ: byte 28345, line 1 % md5sum -b *.bin 7e11df4130968b5e4859f58b9bd6b453 *initial.bin ff14ab080514d5681c99e4e1de01e29f *new.bin 151dd8b1c7bd628afcf38ac6c44155be *test.bin % rsync --version

Re: Apparent synchronization bug in rsync

2022-12-08 Thread Wayne Davison via rsync
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:49 PM Kevin Korb wrote: > The first "Bug Fix" listed in https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.4 is > almost certainly related. Apparently it was fixed via remote option but > since your test doesn't include networking that fix wouldn't help. > No, the bug was

Re: Apparent synchronization bug in rsync

2022-12-08 Thread Mark Raymond via rsync
Interesting, in that bug the problem was *solved* by adding --no-whole-file when using --inplace and --sparse, whereas in my case the problem is *caused* by using --no-whole-file alongside --inplace and --sparse. On 08/12/2022 20:48, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: The first "Bug Fix" listed in

Re: Apparent synchronization bug in rsync

2022-12-08 Thread Kevin Korb via rsync
The first "Bug Fix" listed in https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.4 is almost certainly related. Apparently it was fixed via remote option but since your test doesn't include networking that fix wouldn't help. On 12/8/22 15:03, Mark Raymond via rsync wrote: I believe I have found a