to
just write the log out
David Lang
On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 23:17:30 -
From: "Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)"
To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
Cc: da...@lang.hm
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Equivalent omfile action to a fil
omfile action to a file prefixed by '-'?
it is possible to get the 'unbuffered' mode, but you have to work hard to do it
and the performance will utterly suck (even if you have a
battery-backed-ramdisk, the system calls and serialization will cripple your
performance)
I think this has been
, around 20 years ago.
David Lang
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022, Rainer Gerhards via rsyslog wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:02:28 +0200
From: Rainer Gerhards via rsyslog
To: rsyslog-users
Cc: Rainer Gerhards
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Equivalent omfile action to a file prefixed by '-'?
The - does not throw
The - does not throw a syntax error, but is ignored for many years. iIRC it
caused a sync after each write, which would be crazy for actual systems.
Rainer
Sent from phone, thus brief.
John Chivian via rsyslog schrieb am Do., 29.
Sep. 2022, 23:25:
> If I am not mistaken, buffering is the
If I am not mistaken, buffering is the default in the new syntax such that it
is not necessary to state it explicitly. The maintainers will know for sure.
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 15:54, Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) via rsyslog
> wrote:
>
> In the old style of rsyslog configuration,
In the old style of rsyslog configuration, you can say that you want to buffer
a file, rather than flush it after every write, with syntax like this
(prefixing the filename with '-'):
local4.info -/var/log/mylog
Reading the documentation of the omfile Output Module, I don't see an
6 matches
Mail list logo
