David,
It seems to me that the example that creates a routing loop depends on having
two routes where
one non-default source prefix of one route contains the source prefix of the
other route
Specifically, S=2001:db8::/32 contains S=2001:db8:::/48.
I think that we can resolve the
Matthieu,
I believe the tables could be similarly collapsed giving source address
higher precedence than destination address. Do you disagree?
Thanks,
Acee
On 7/26/17, 9:05 AM, "Matthieu Boutier" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>David, you're right, and as you remark, the draft says:
>
>2.5:
Hi,
David, you're right, and as you remark, the draft says:
2.5: « It is also useful to note that the prefixes assigned to the site by
different ISPs will not overlap. »
This hypothesis breaks your example. But, as you, I think that we should
not rely on such hypothesis: it seems