OP = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
OP rtl-3.0preX ??
i dont't think that rtl has influence on the stl? why should rtl
define a macro which is used only by the c++ stl?
The RTL posix interface I guess. As I remember the STL of libstdc++/gcc-2.95.2
isn't thread save and I wonder to find
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:35:42PM +0300, Michael Barabanov wrote:
"lost NNN jiffies" is some old debugging output.
You can comment the printf out in rtl_time.c. Even better,
upgrade to 3.0pre9 on 2.2.17.
Really only an old debugging output???!! After getting messages about,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:35:42PM +0300, Michael Barabanov wrote:
"lost NNN jiffies" is some old debugging output.
You can comment the printf out in rtl_time.c. Even better,
upgrade to 3.0pre9 on 2.2.17.
Really only an old debugging output???!! After getting messages about,
say,
Victor / Dean,
I can't speak for Dean, but I can tell you what I think he is
looking for given our lunch together during the workshop. I can also tell
you what *I* would like to see.
This would also be helpful for people who want to be able to run
multiple copies of the same RT
Fri, 08 Dec 2000 Bill Simpson wrote:
I went through the mailing list archive and I saw one recent thread on
this. The info I needed wasn't really there.
I am doing vision research where I present a visual display (drifting
grating embedded in Gaussian white noise) and get a response (button
Thu, 07 Dec 2000 Karim Yaghmour wrote:
[...]
Although, I must admit that the above idea might be usefull for whoever would
like to use RTL or RTAI without using Linux at all. In that case, one could
strip the kernel options to a bare minimum and use it only as a host for the
RT parasite ...
Cort Dougan wrote:
} I was just wondering if programming the timer in one-shot mode might cause the
} normal system timer interrupt to be called at an unusual interval (thus
} affecting the jiffie count, etc). Seems that the linux layer will get its fake
} timer interrupt when (and only
There are many levels of globallness (I may patent that word!).
Right now, there does not appear to be any way to define a variable so that
it is global to the module, but not global to the entire kernel. To make
things even more difficult, it would be nice there were some mechanism
Are you seeing that happen? If so, you shouldn't. It won't happen on
ppc/mips/alpha. We take into account the Linux task when setting the next
tick. If we can give Linux its tick on-time without affecting RT tasks we
do.
In your example what should happens is linux gets its tick at 10ms from
