Re: [rules-dev] [drools] Fixing issue where indented keywords would fail template expansion. (#170)

2013-01-13 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Even though I added some classes to the template package, my heart never really was in it. I'm sure some considerably more powerful implementations for template driven text generation are available out there, and if this feature needs to be continued, basing it on such a package would be far

Re: [rules-dev] [Bug] due to MVEL, once more

2013-01-13 Thread Mark Proctor
This will be related to the MVEL static analyser that produces the variable stack. I guess it's not correctly adding drools to this array. Mario will look into it this week. Mark On 13 Jan 2013, at 18:27, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote: 5.5.0. This simple DRL does not compile

Re: [rules-dev] [drools] Fixing issue where indented keywords would fail template expansion. (#170)

2013-01-13 Thread Mark Proctor
I just don't think drools-templates is needed. Everything you could need for tempting is provided by MVEL templating, out of the box. If I was writing a system that needed templating, I would just use MVEL, not drools-template. drools-templates tries to bring templating to decision tables, and

Re: [rules-dev] [Bug] due to MVEL, once more

2013-01-13 Thread Mario Fusco
I'll give a look at it asap. Thanks for reporting this. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.comwrote: 5.5.0. This simple DRL does not compile unless dialect mvel is removed. insert is not recognized within a for loop body. rule demo dialect mvel when then