Re: [rules-users] JITting error with 5.5.0.CR1

2012-11-09 Thread paulk_asert
No replies? Is this getting through? Should I raise an issue for the bug? paulk_asert wrote I should have added that the script still completes successfully, it is only the JIT optimization that is having problems and only when some threshold is reached causing an attempt at performing the

Re: [rules-users] JITting error with 5.5.0.CR1

2012-11-09 Thread Mario Fusco
Hi Paul, sorry for the delay in my reply. The issue you're reporting looks very weird at least because it seems to depend on the specific values you put in that expression. It would be great if you could open a ticket on jira and possibly attach to the ticket a test case to reproduce the bug.

Re: [rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

2012-11-09 Thread dunnlow
Salaboy, the issue I have is that I want users to be able to see the process graphically, so I think that means I need one overall process (I may use a few sub-processes). Using rules however as you suggest is there a way to pause a process until a message (/signal) with certain criteria is

Re: [rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

2012-11-09 Thread Esteban Aliverti
What you seem to be looking for is a Conditional Start Event where you can define the condition using Drools syntax. What you should do when you want to introduce a wait point is to do the merge of you current flow with one of this Conditional Start Event using an Converging Parallel Gateway. The

Re: [rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Proctor
he's talking about the flexible processes, where rules can control the execution of processes. It's a feature we have, that not many people are aware of - it's not ready for prime time use, still incubator. Krisv will respond in a bit, with some pointers. Mark On 9 Nov 2012, at 14:26, Esteban

Re: [rules-users] drools grid or other high availability solution?

2012-11-09 Thread Justin Case
Not even a single idea? :( JC - Original Message - From: Justin Case send_lotsa_spam_h...@yahoo.com To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org rules-users@lists.jboss.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:33 PM Subject: [rules-users] drools grid or other high availability solution?

Re: [rules-users] drools grid or other high availability solution?

2012-11-09 Thread Mauricio Salatino
Hi Justin, We are working on it, drools-grid was an experimental project to start the design. We also have the Drools Server using camel, and we will continue the development of the remoting APIs, probably after the next release. Cheers On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Justin Case

Re: [rules-users] drools grid or other high availability solution?

2012-11-09 Thread Justin Case
D'uh how could I have missed that. You're so right, I will check with Camel. Thank you Mauricio! JC From: Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com To: Justin Case send_lotsa_spam_h...@yahoo.com; Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, November

Re: [rules-users] drools grid or other high availability solution?

2012-11-09 Thread Mauricio Salatino
No Problem Justin, Let us know if you have any trouble! On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Justin Case send_lotsa_spam_h...@yahoo.com wrote: D'uh how could I have missed that. You're so right, I will check with Camel. Thank you Mauricio! JC -- *From:*