Hi,
Drools supports 'contains' and 'member of' operators. You can find more
information about them in the documentation.
Regards,
Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ganesh R.
Hi, I want to replace an outdated function defined in a drl file without
touching that file, is this possible? (in 5.5.0)
The java application part that loads the resources cannot be touched as
well. It is configured to read all the drl files from a predefined folder, I
am only allowed to add-in
No worries. I found another solution: use newByteArrayResource to build the
new function and load it into the current kb.
But still, I would like to know the solution to method 2.
Cheers,
--
View this message in context:
HI
You can add this in when condition which works fine
$bat : Account(balance == 100,types contains Savings types contains
Checking )
Regards
Ganesh Neelekani
India
--
View this message in context:
Hi Rich,
Download from
download.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/guvnor-distribution-5.5.0.Final.zip
unzip it you can find 3 .war files in binaries folder
you can get the 3 war files for jboss ,apeche ,eap etc... take jboss
drools
and deploy it.
you r using
Hey again,
I've searched the net for similar problem and found this post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3429420/why-java-util-hashmap-getentry-can-block-my-program
(17.07.13)
After that I've checked the CompositeClassLoader class and found that the
object classLoaderResultMap (line 244)
Hi,
Thanks for your advice, but I need to get 5.5.1 working rather than 5.5.0 as
it has some fixes for IE8.
However, I did manage to get the 5.5.1 working but there still seems to be
problems with IE8..
--
View this message in context:
Hi. I'm trying to test pmml decision trees
(https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools-chance/tree/master/drools-pmml)
on Drools 5.5.0.Final.
The two test environment's outcome are not same.
1) I got a test on Eclipse. The results are fine. Test source is as below.
public class PMMLTestFromLocal {
Platform:JBoss SOAP 5.2 for ESB deploymetn with BRMS Standalone 5.3 for
authoring and retrieving rules from Guvnor.I am executing CEP logic with the
BusinessRulesProcess ESB aciton. I pass it the following
properties:property name=quot;lt;bruleAgentProperties*
value=kie-agent/ChangeSet.xml
ge0ffrey wrote
Do you have this issue in 5.4 too? E.g.: the 5.4 equivalent of full
assert (TRACE) does not detect score corruption?
I've tried this and actually, yes, it happens with TRACE in 5.4 as well. So
it's not an issue introduced by the upgrade to Beta5, then.
ge0ffrey wrote
Maybe
On 17-07-13 11:59, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
Do you have this issue in 5.4 too? E.g.: the 5.4 equivalent of full
assert (TRACE) does not detect score corruption?
I've tried this and actually, yes, it happens with TRACE in 5.4 as well. So
it's not an issue introduced by the upgrade
File a jira, this sounds like a bug in the example:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS
PS: Miss manners is a poor example to benchmark btw.
It's NP complete so a slow rule engine with a smart manners approach
will beat a fast rule engine with a basic
ge0ffrey wrote
The 7 one probably got inserted with it didn't reach to 5 yet. That was
a good logicalInsertion.
The issue is, why didn't it get retracted when a move made changes so it
did reach to 5?
I've added a printline in the rules xml file before the insertLogical. At
one point shortly
Thanks for reporting, to reproduce this I would need:
- the source PMML
- the changeset xml
- the tomcat version
Meanwhile, could you check that the tomcat environment is using the right
dependencies?
Best
Davide
--
View this message in context:
On 17-07-13 13:02, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
The 7 one probably got inserted with it didn't reach to 5 yet. That was
a good logicalInsertion.
The issue is, why didn't it get retracted when a move made changes so it
did reach to 5?
I've added a printline in the rules xml file before
Hi,
I am not able to run rules from .pkg resources.
Knowledgesession is getting populated with package and rules inside the
packages but when I am firing ksession.fireAllRules(); no rules are getting
executed.
Below is my program
final KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder =
Have you tested that the rules fire when you load them as DRL?
It would probably be worth showing us what EmployeeMap looks like and the rule
which you expect to fire if there is an EmployeeMap in working memory.
The Drools version would also be useful.
Steve
On 17 Jul 2013, at 14:04,
What are your rules?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-help-on-drools-guvnor-tp4024975p4024977.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
Can anyone please advise to my above problem ?
Thanks,
Sri
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DRL-always-posting-the-format-as-txt-instead-of-model-drl-tp4024952p4024978.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130717/6d327e7a/attachment.html
Why have you declared the class in a POJO and in the .DRL format?
I'm assuming you've uploaded the POJO into guvnor, and the used that to
declare your rules?
--
View this message in context:
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130717/6d327e7a/attachment.html
--
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org
manners is a pretty terrible benchmark, and should probably not be used. Most
vendors cheat it, and it doesn't really tell you much. Also to work it expects
an OPS5 execution order, which we've attempted to emulate in the past, we may
not in the future - which is probably why you have the
ge0ffrey wrote
On 17-07-13 13:02, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
The 7 one probably got inserted with it didn't reach to 5 yet. That was
a good logicalInsertion.
The issue is, why didn't it get retracted when a move made changes so it
did reach to 5?
I've added a printline in the rules
Hello all, I'm totally new to optaplanner / drools and would like to know
if the following is possible within the framework (I'd mostly likely use
version 6).
I have a VRP where we'd like to consider multiple waste streams
simultaneously (i.e. trash, recycling, food waste, and yard waste). We'd
Hi,
I'm working for a client who wishes to use Guvnor with Internet Explorer.
I've tried Guvnor 5.5.0.Final with IE8 and IE9. However, I get an error when
trying to access a rule in the guided editor.
I read in another post
I'm going to be in Hawaii for 3 weeks in september, visiting honolulu, kauaui
and maui.
Is there a Drools community on any of those islands, I could be tempted to
attend a user group and do a Drools 6 talk :)
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
*1. chageset xml is*
change-set xmlns='http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set'
xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
xs:schemaLocation='http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set
*3. PMML Source (1)*
package Meritz_ModelRule_01;
import org.drools.pmml.pmml_4_1.ModelMarker;
import org.drools.pmml.pmml_4_1.PMML4AbstractField;
query modelMarker( String $model, ModelMarker $mm )
$mm := ModelMarker( $model ; )
end
declare PMML4AbstractField
end
declare DataField
*3. PMML Source (2)*
// Display Name : null
declare AC_CSE_TYP_RE extends DataField
@role(event)
@Traitable
value : java.lang.String @key @position(1)
displayValue : String = AC_CSE_TYP_RE
weight : double = 1.0
end
rule Valid_Values_AC_CSE_TYP_RE
no-loop
*3. Source PMML*
Source PMML is two long. That is over 2500 lines.
I can't attached file this site.
So I will post source to split.
Thanks Davide
--
View this message in context:
package Meritz_ModelRule_01;
import org.drools.pmml.pmml_4_1.ModelMarker;
import org.drools.pmml.pmml_4_1.PMML4AbstractField;
query modelMarker( String $model, ModelMarker $mm )
$mm := ModelMarker( $model ; )
end
declare PMML4AbstractField
end
declare DataField extends
rule OverrideInput_FDS_AC_YN
salience 2
when
$new: java.lang.String() from entry-point in_FDS_AC_YN
$old: FDS_AC_YN( value != $new )
then
System.out.println( Overriding previous values + $old + because of
+ $new );
retract( $old );
end
// Display Name : null
declare
rule OverrideInput_AC_TYP_RE
salience 2
when
$new: java.lang.String() from entry-point in_AC_TYP_RE
$old: AC_TYP_RE( value != $new )
then
System.out.println( Overriding previous values + $old + because of
+ $new );
retract( $old );
end
// Display Name : null
declare
rule OverrideInput_COV_CD_RE
salience 2
when
$new: java.lang.String() from entry-point in_COV_CD_RE
$old: COV_CD_RE( value != $new )
then
System.out.println( Overriding previous values + $old + because of
+ $new );
retract( $old );
end
// Display Name : null
declare CHK_YN
// Display Name : null
declare Predicted_CHK_YN extends OutputField
@role(event)
@Traitable
value : java.lang.String @key @position(1)
displayValue : String = Predicted_CHK_YN
weight : double = 1.0
tgtValue : java.lang.String
end
rule
rule miningField_RPart_Model_AC_CSE_TYP_RE
when
$src : AC_CSE_TYP_RE( $m : missing, $v : valid, $x : value, context ==
null )
then
System.out.println(miningField_RPart_Model_AC_CSE_TYP_RE);
AC_CSE_TYP_RE x = new AC_CSE_TYP_RE();
x.setValue($x);
x.setMissing($m);
rule Create tree RPart_Model
when
ModelMarker( RPart_Model ; enabled == true )
then
System.out.println(Create tree RPart_Model);
TreeNode node;
java.util.Map count;
java.util.Map confs;
count = new java.util.HashMap();
count.put( N, 68206.0 );
count = new java.util.HashMap();
count.put( N, 93.0 ); count.put( Y, 66.0 );
confs = new java.util.HashMap();
confs.put( N, 0.584905660377358 ); confs.put( Y,
0.415094339622642 );
node = new TreeNode( RPart_Model,
rule Link RPart_ModelInput
when
RPart_ModelInput(
_AC_CSE_TYP_RE : AC_CSE_TYP_RE
,
_AC_TYP_RE : AC_TYP_RE
,
_COV_CD_RE : COV_CD_RE
,
_HDCAP_RATE_RE : HDCAP_RATE_RE
,
_AC_STAT_CD_RE :
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 3 - Unknown Weighted
salience 3
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 3, $out :
outcome )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 3,
visitMode == WEIGHTED_CONFIDENCE || ==
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 6 - Down
salience $children.size() - $children.indexOf( $child )
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 6, $children :
children, children.size 0 )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 6,
$trail : trail,
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 13 - True
salience 3
no-loop
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 13, $out :
outcome,
children.size == 0, $conf : confidence, $tot :
recordCount )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current ==
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 26 - Down
salience $children.size() - $children.indexOf( $child )
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 26, $children
: children, children.size 0 )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 26,
$trail : trail,
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 53 - Default Child Undo Jump
salience 5
no-loop
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 53, $def :
defaultChld != null != null )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 53,
visitMode == DEFAULT_CHILD, downward
Couldn't you post this to a site and just include the email in a link?
On Jul 18, 2013, at 4:51 AM, smilk sunghee@meritz.co.kr wrote:
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 26 - Down
salience $children.size() - $children.indexOf( $child )
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model,
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 215 - Unknown Weighted
salience 3
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 215, $out :
outcome )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current ==
215,
visitMode == WEIGHTED_CONFIDENCE || ==
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 106 - True
salience 3
no-loop
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 106, $out :
outcome,
children.size == 0, $conf : confidence, $tot :
recordCount )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 12 - Down
salience $children.size() - $children.indexOf( $child )
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 12, $children
: children, children.size 0 )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 12,
$trail : trail,
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 25 - Default Child
salience 3
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 25, $def :
defaultChld != null != null )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 25,
visitMode == DEFAULT_CHILD, downward == true,
rule Eval Tree Node RPart_Model - 2 - Unknown Weighted
salience 3
when
$node : TreeNode( context == RPart_Model, $id : id == 2, $out :
outcome )
$tok : RPart_ModelTreeToken( context == RPart_Model, current == 2,
visitMode == WEIGHTED_CONFIDENCE || ==
Sorry, Andrew.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/PMML-Exception-excuting-consequence-for-rule-xxx-in-yyy-java-lang-NullPointerException-using-Knowledt-tp4024963p4025014.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
PMML Source URL is
https://code.google.com/p/test-smilk/source/browse/pmml2.drl
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/PMML-Exception-excuting-consequence-for-rule-xxx-in-yyy-java-lang-NullPointerException-using-Knowledt-tp4024963p4025015.html
Sent from the Drools:
I'm using the Nurse Rostering code as a base and adding my own rules, etc.
Are there any examples of wanted patterns? It looks like all the input
files, and the drl rules are all for unwanted patterns. I just want to
make sure I'm not missing something obvious.
--
View this message in context:
Any help with my issue please ?
Thanks,
Sri
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DRL-always-posting-the-format-as-txt-instead-of-model-drl-tp4024952p4025017.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
I am currently writing a set of Rules to Validate Some Business Logic and
if The Criteria in When clause is met throw an Exception.
Currently I have two rules. I use a StatelessKnowledgeSession and
CommandExecutor.execute method to fire the rules.
But while testing I created a scenario to
56 matches
Mail list logo
